Extrinsic cognitive load impairs low-level speech perception

被引:46
作者
Mattys, Sven L. [1 ]
Barden, Katharine [2 ]
Samuel, Arthur G. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Psychol, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Psychol, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Psychol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[4] Basque Ctr Cognit Brain & Language, Donostia San Sebastian, Spain
[5] Basque Fdn Sci, Ikerbasque, Bilbao, Spain
关键词
Speech perception; Divided attention; Cognitive load; Phoneme restoration; Lexical access; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; RESTORATION; ATTENTION; RECOGNITION;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-013-0544-7
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Recent research has suggested that the extrinsic cognitive load generated by performing a nonlinguistic visual task while perceiving speech increases listeners' reliance on lexical knowledge and decreases their capacity to perceive phonetic detail. In the present study, we asked whether this effect is accounted for better at a lexical or a sublexical level. The former would imply that cognitive load directly affects lexical activation but not perceptual sensitivity; the latter would imply that increased lexical reliance under cognitive load is only a secondary consequence of imprecise or incomplete phonetic encoding. Using the phoneme restoration paradigm, we showed that perceptual sensitivity decreases (i.e., phoneme restoration increases) almost linearly with the effort involved in the concurrent visual task. However, cognitive load had only a minimal effect on the contribution of lexical information to phoneme restoration. We concluded that the locus of extrinsic cognitive load on the speech system is perceptual rather than lexical. Mechanisms by which cognitive load increases tolerance to acoustic imprecision and broadens phonemic categories were discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 754
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
    Barr, Dale J.
    Levy, Roger
    Scheepers, Christoph
    Tily, Harry J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) : 255 - 278
  • [2] Brungart D., 2013, P M AC, V19, DOI DOI 10.1121/1.4800033
  • [3] Speech perception engages a general timer: Evidence from a divided attention word identification task
    Casini, Laurence
    Burle, Boris
    Nguyen, Noel
    [J]. COGNITION, 2009, 112 (02) : 318 - 322
  • [4] Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech
    Francis, Alexander L.
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2010, 72 (02) : 501 - 516
  • [5] PHONETIC CATEGORIZATION IN AUDITORY WORD PERCEPTION
    GANONG, WF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1980, 6 (01) : 110 - 125
  • [6] ATTENTIONAL MODULATION OF THE PHONETIC SIGNIFICANCE OF ACOUSTIC CUES
    GORDON, PC
    EBERHARDT, JL
    RUECKL, JG
    [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 25 (01) : 1 - 42
  • [7] Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review
    Mattys, Sven L.
    Davis, Matthew H.
    Bradlow, Ann R.
    Scott, Sophie K.
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2012, 27 (7-8): : 953 - 978
  • [8] Effects of cognitive load on speech recognition
    Mattys, Sven L.
    Wiget, Lukas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2011, 65 (02) : 145 - 160
  • [9] Effects of attention on the strength of lexical influences on speech perception: Behavioral experiments and computational mechanisms
    Mirman, Daniel
    McClelland, James L.
    Holt, Lori L.
    Magnuson, James S.
    [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2008, 32 (02) : 398 - 417
  • [10] Attention modulates sound processing in human auditory cortex but not the inferior colliculus
    Rinne, Teemu
    Stecker, G. Christopher
    Kang, Xiaojian
    Yund, E. William
    Herron, Timothy J.
    Woods, David L.
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2007, 18 (13) : 1311 - 1314