A comparison of oral azithromycin with topical oxytetracycline/polymyxin for the treatment of trachoma in children

被引:67
|
作者
Dawson, CR
Schachter, J
Sallam, S
Sheta, A
Rubinstein, RA
Washton, H
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DEPT LAB MED,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
[2] UNIV ALEXANDRIA,SCH MED,DEPT OPHTHALMOL,ALEXANDRIA,EGYPT
[3] UNIV ALEXANDRIA,HIGH INST PUBL HLTH,DEPT EPIDEMIOL,ALEXANDRIA,EGYPT
[4] PFIZER INT,NEW YORK,NY
关键词
D O I
10.1093/clinids/24.3.363
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Trachoma, an infectious keratoconjunctivitis caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, is a leading cause of preventable blindness in developing countries. In this study we compared oral azithromycin with oxytetracycline/polymyxin eye ointment (once daily for 5 days every 4 weeks; total of six treatment cycles) for the treatment of active endemic trachoma in 168 rural Egyptian children. A suspension of azithromycin was administered to children as a dose of 20 mg/kg by one of three schedules: a single dose, one dose a week for 3 weeks, and one dose every 4 weeks for a total of six doses. The children's clinical status and chlamydial infection rates were evaluated for I year. The clinical cure rates were 35% 2 months after initial treatment, 16% at 8 months (during the annual autumn epidemic of purulent conjunctivitis), and 47% at 1 year. The pretreatment chlamydial infection rate of 33% (determined by direct immunofluorescence) decreased to 5% at 2 months and was 9% at 12 months. There were no significant clinical or laboratory differences among the four treatment groups. Thus, 1-6 doses of azithromycin were equivalent to 30 days of topical oxytetracycline/polymyxin ointment and may offer an effective alternative means of controlling endemic trachoma.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 368
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Three-day course of oral azithromycin vs topical oxytetracycline/polymyxin in treatment of active endemic trachoma
    Guzey, M
    Aslan, G
    Ozardali, I
    Basar, E
    Satici, A
    Karadede, S
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 44 (04) : 387 - 391
  • [2] TRACHOMA TREATMENT WITH ORAL AZITHROMYCIN OR TOPICAL TETRACYCLINE
    DAWSON, CR
    SALLAM, S
    SHETA, A
    RUBINSTEIN, RA
    WASHTON, H
    SCHACHTER, J
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1993, 34 (04) : 851 - 851
  • [3] Efficacy of oral azithromycin versus topical tetracycline in mass treatment of endemic trachoma
    Fraser-Hurt, N
    Bailey, RL
    Cousens, S
    Mabey, D
    Faal, H
    Mabey, DCW
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2001, 79 (07) : 632 - 640
  • [4] Operational comparison of single-dose azithromycin and topical tetracycline for trachoma
    Bowman, RJC
    Sillah, A
    van Dehn, C
    Goode, VM
    Muquit, M
    Johnson, GJ
    Milligan, P
    Rowley, J
    Faal, H
    Bailey, RL
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (13) : 4074 - 4079
  • [5] Distribution of azithromycin for the treatment of trachoma
    Taylor, K
    Taylor, HR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 83 (02) : 134 - 135
  • [6] Impact of community-based mass treatment for trachoma with oral azithromycin on general morbidity in Gambian children
    Whitty, CJM
    Glasgow, KW
    Sadiq, ST
    Mabey, DC
    Bailey, R
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1999, 18 (11) : 955 - 958
  • [7] Oral azithromycin combined with topical anti-inflammatory agents in the treatment of blepharokeratoconjunctivitis in children
    Choi, Daniel S.
    Djalilian, Ali
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2013, 17 (01): : 112 - 113
  • [8] A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TOPICAL TETRACYCLINE, BENZOYL-PEROXIDE GEL AND ORAL OXYTETRACYCLINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ACNE
    NORRIS, JFB
    HUGHES, BR
    BASEY, AJ
    CUNLIFFE, WJ
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 1991, 16 (01) : 31 - 33
  • [9] FAMILY-BASED SUPPRESSIVE INTERMITTENT THERAPY OF HYPER-ENDEMIC TRACHOMA WITH TOPICAL OXYTETRACYCLINE OR ORAL DOXYCYCLINE
    DAROUGAR, S
    JONES, BR
    VISWALINGAM, N
    POIRIER, RH
    ALLAMI, J
    HOUSHMAND, A
    FARAHMANDIAN, MA
    GIBSON, JA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1980, 64 (04) : 291 - 295