Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts produced by dental implants with different geometries

被引:10
作者
Bohner, Lauren [1 ,2 ]
Meier, Norbert [3 ]
Gremse, Felix [4 ]
Tortamano, Pedro [2 ]
Kleinheinz, Johannes [1 ]
Hanisch, Marcel [1 ]
机构
[1] Muenster Univ Hosp, Dept Cranio Maxillofacial Surg, Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Clin Muenster, Inst Clin Radiol, Munster, Germany
[4] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, HelmholtInst, Expt Mol Imaging, Aachen, Germany
关键词
dental implants; magnetic resonance imaging; microCT; SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; MRI; ZIRCONIUM; TITANIUM; VOLUME; CT;
D O I
10.1259/dmfr.20200121
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the MRI-artifact pattern produced by titanium and zirconia dental implants with different geometries (diameter and height). Methods: Three titanium (Titan SLA, Straumann) and three zirconia (Pure Ceramic Implant, Straumann) dental implants differing on their design (diameter x height) were installed in porcine bone samples. Samples were scanned with a MRI (3T, T1W turbo spin echo sequence, TR/TE 25/3.5ms, voxel size 0.22x0.22x0.50 mm, scan time 11:18). Micro-CT was used as control group (80kV, 125mA, voxel size 161 mu m). Artifacts' distribution was measured at vestibular and lingual sites, mesial and distal sites, and at the apex. Statistical analysis was performed with Within-ANOVA (p=0.05). Results: Artifacts distribution measured 2.57 +/- 1.09 mm for titanium artifacts and 0.37 +/- 0.20 mm for zirconia artifacts (p<0.05). Neither the measured sites (p=0.73) nor the implant geometries (p=0.43) influenced the appearance of artifacts. Conclusion: Artifacts were higher for titanium than zirconia implants. The artifacts pattern was similar for different dental implant geometries.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Blankenstein F, 2015, J OROFAC ORTHOP, V76, P14, DOI 10.1007/s00056-014-0258-0
[2]   Magnetic permeability as a predictor of the artefact size caused by orthodontic appliances at 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Blankenstein, Felix H. ;
Asbach, Patrick ;
Beuer, Florian ;
Glienke, Johannes ;
Mayer, Stefan ;
Zachriat, Christine .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 21 (01) :281-289
[3]   MRI Disturbances Caused by Dental Materials [J].
Bryll, A. ;
Urbanik, A. ;
Chrzan, R. ;
Jurczak, A. ;
Kwapinska, H. ;
Sobiecka, B. .
NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 20 (01) :9-17
[4]  
Chockattu Sherin Jose, 2018, Restor Dent Endod, V43, pe39
[5]  
Demirturk Kocasarac Husniye, 2018, Dent Clin North Am, V62, P467, DOI 10.1016/j.cden.2018.03.006
[6]   Magnetic resonance imaging in zirconia-based dental implantology [J].
Duttenhoefer, Fabian ;
Mertens, Marianne E. ;
Vizkelety, Josef ;
Gremse, Felix ;
Stadelmann, Vincent A. ;
Sauerbier, Sebastian .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (10) :1195-1202
[7]   "Black bone" MRI: a potential alternative to CT when imaging the head and neck: report of eight clinical cases and review of the Oxford experience [J].
Eley, K. A. ;
Watt-Smith, S. R. ;
Golding, S. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1019) :1457-1464
[8]   G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Lang, Albert-Georg ;
Buchner, Axel .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) :175-191
[9]   Magnetic resonance imaging of intraoral hard and soft tissues using an intraoral coil and FLASH sequences [J].
Fluegge, Tabea ;
Hoevener, Jan-Bernd ;
Ludwig, Ute ;
Eisenbeiss, Anne-Kathrin ;
Spittau, Bjoern ;
Hennig, Juergen ;
Schmelzeisen, Rainer ;
Nelson, Katja .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (12) :4616-4623
[10]   MRI susceptibility artefacts related to scaphoid screws: Te effect of screw type, screw orientation and imaging parameters [J].
Ganapathi, M ;
Joseph, G ;
Savage, R ;
Jones, AR ;
Timms, B ;
Lyons, K .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2002, 27B (02) :165-170