A cognitive map integrated intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making procedure for provider selection in project management

被引:6
作者
Dursun, Mehtap [1 ]
Goker, Nazli [1 ]
Mutlu, Hakan [1 ]
机构
[1] Galatasaray Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Intuitionistic fuzzy sets; intuitionistic fuzzy cognitive map; IFTOPSIS; outsourcing provider selection; project management; agile; lean six-sigma; PORTFOLIO SELECTION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3233/JIFS-189125
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Organizations make use of project management methodologies, which provide an effective manner to achieve managerial goals, maintain the strength of the companies in increasing competition. Efficiency in planning, budgeting, and scheduling are provided so that high quality outputs are obtained through these processes. Agile project management methodology, which has been emerged from unpredictability of customer requirements and changeable business environment, is apt to cope with the failures of traditional project management tools. Besides, lean six-sigma project management methodology has become a combination of lean and six-sigma, which were opponent methodologies previously. This paper aims to determine the most suitable outsourcing provider alternative by presenting a novel cognitive maps-based intuitionistic fuzzy decision making procedure. Interrelationships among evaluation criteria are weighted employing intuitionistic fuzzy cognitive map technique because of the causal links among evaluation criteria, vagueness, fuzziness, and hesitation in data. Moreover, the most appropriate provider alternative for both agile and lean six-sigma project management methodologies is identified by utilizing intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method, which aims for minimizing the closeness to the ideal solution while maximizing the distance from the anti-ideal solution in hesitative environment. The case study is carried out in a bank that performs in Turkish banking sector.
引用
收藏
页码:6645 / 6655
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2024, Axelrod, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, NOTES NUMBER THEORY
[3]  
Asan U, 2016, J MULT-VALUED LOG S, V26, P541
[4]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[5]   A Hybrid MCDM Technique for Risk Management in Construction Projects [J].
Chatterjee, Kajal ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Tamosaitiene, Jolanta ;
Adhikary, Krishnendu ;
Kar, Samarjit .
SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2018, 10 (02)
[6]   Analysis of performance measures in cloud-based ubiquitous SaaS CRM project systems [J].
Chen, You-Shyang ;
Wu, Chienwen ;
Chu, Heng-Hsing ;
Lin, Chien-Ku ;
Chuang, Huan-Ming .
JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2018, 74 (03) :1132-1156
[7]   Selecting a project's methodology [J].
Cockburn, A .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 2000, 17 (04) :64-+
[8]   Some operations on intuitionistic fuzzy sets [J].
De, SK ;
Biswas, R ;
Roy, AR .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (03) :477-484
[9]   Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS multi-attribute decision making method based on revised scoring function and entropy weight method [J].
Ding, Quanyu ;
Wang, Ying-Ming .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (01) :625-635
[10]   Criteria evaluation for pricing decisions in strategic marketing management using an intuitionistic cognitive map approach [J].
Dogu, Elif ;
Albayrak, Y. Esra .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 22 (15) :4989-5005