Relapse and cure rates of prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy and 5 years of follow-up

被引:28
作者
Vassilikos, EJK
Yu, H
Trachtenberg, J
Nam, RK
Narod, SA
Bromberg, IL
Diamandis, EP
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Sect Canc Prevent, Shreveport, LA 71105 USA
[3] Toronto Hosp, Div Urol, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Ctr Res Womens Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Lab Med & Pathobiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
prostate cancer; cancer monitoring; prostate specific antigen; ultrasensitive assay; cancer relapse; cancer cure; tumor markers;
D O I
10.1016/S0009-9120(99)00099-5
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: We have compared the ability of an ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen assay and a regular PSA assay to identify relapse and cure rates of prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy, during a 5-year follow-up period. Design and methods: We measured PSA by an ultrasensitive assay (detection limit 0.001 ng/ml) and a conventional PSA assay (detection limit 0.1 ng/mL) in serial serum samples obtained from 197 patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy. Results: Based on ultrasensitive PSA analysis, we have identified three groups of patients: 62% of patients did not show any significant changes in serum PSA; 15% of patients demonstrated slow PSA increases over time but none of the measurements exceeded 0.1 ng/mL within 4 years; and 23% of the patients had relatively significant increases of serum PSA and were classified as having 'fast relapse'. The vast majority of these patients were subsequently identified to have relapse by the regular PSA assay. The ultrasensitive PSA assay detected relapse by an average of eighteen months earlier than the conventional PSA method. Fast relapsing patients were associated with other prognostic indicators of the disease including pre-operative PSA, tumor volume, Gleason score, clinical stage, surgical margin positivity. periprostatic tissue involvement, capsular invasion and seminal vesicle invasion. The group with slowly rising PSA had prognosis which was between the patients in remission and fast relapsing patients. Conclusions: The use of ultrasensitive PSA analysis for monitoring patients after radical prostatectomy provides earlier detection of relapse (by 18 months) and identifies three distinct groups of patients. Fast relapsing patients should be good candidates for early therapeutic interventions. Copyright (C) 2000 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 123
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of biochemical progression rates after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer
    Akduman, B
    Crawford, ED
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2006, 3 (02): : 78 - 79
  • [42] Long-Term Follow-up of Patients with Prostate Cancer and Nodal Metastases Treated by Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and Radical Prostatectomy: The Positive Impact of Adjuvant Radiotherapy
    Da Pozzo, Luigi F.
    Cozzarini, Cesare
    Briganti, Alberto
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Salonia, Andrea
    Bertini, Roberto
    Gallina, Andrea
    Bianchi, Marco
    Fantini, Gemma V.
    Bolognesi, Angelo
    Fazio, Ferruccio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (05) : 1003 - 1011
  • [43] Prostate cancer incidence in men with self-reported prostatitis after 15 years of follow-up
    Vaarala, Markku H.
    Mehik, Aare
    Ohtonen, Pasi
    Hellstrom, Pekka A.
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 12 (02) : 1149 - 1153
  • [44] Very late prostate cancer local recurrence 23 years after radical prostatectomy
    Liedberg, Fredrik
    Olsson, Hans
    Sundqvist, Pernilla
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 46 (04): : 304 - 305
  • [45] Efficacy of radical prostatectomy on prostate cancer patients and analysis of risk factors for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Yang, Xinping
    Shi, Yuanyuan
    Lin, Yang
    Tian, Yuxin
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2020, 25 (06): : 2623 - 2628
  • [46] Follow-up in prostate cancer patients: Which parameters are necessary?
    Strohmaier, WL
    Keller, T
    Bichler, KH
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 35 (01) : 21 - 25
  • [47] Clinical results of radical prostatectomy for patients with prostate cancer in Macau
    Son-Fat, Ho
    Hio-Fai, Lao
    Kin, Li
    Men-Kin, Tse
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 121 (04) : 295 - 298
  • [48] PSA BOUNCE AND BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE AFTER BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER: A STUDY OF 820 PATIENTS WITH A MINIMUM OF 3 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP
    Caloglu, Murat
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Angermeier, Kenneth
    Ulchaker, James
    Chehade, Nabil
    Altman, Andrew
    Magi-Galuzzi, Christina
    Klein, Eric A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (03): : 735 - 741
  • [49] Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Prostate Cancer, at Cancer Diagnosis and after a One-Year Follow-Up
    Duarte, Vitor
    Araujo, Natalia
    Lopes, Catarina
    Costa, Adriana
    Ferreira, Augusto
    Carneiro, Filipa
    Oliveira, Jorge
    Braga, Isaac
    Morais, Samantha
    Pacheco-Figueiredo, Luis
    Ruano, Luis
    Tedim Cruz, Vitor
    Pereira, Susana
    Lunet, Nuno
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (15)
  • [50] Functional and Oncological Outcomes After Open Versus Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer: 8-Year Follow-up
    Lantz, Anna
    Bock, David
    Akre, Olof
    Angenete, Eva
    Bjartell, Anders
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Modig, Katarina Koss
    Nyberg, Martin
    Kollberg, Karin Stinesen
    Steineck, Gunnar
    Stranne, Johan
    Wiklund, Peter
    Haglind, Eva
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 80 (05) : 650 - 660