Relapse and cure rates of prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy and 5 years of follow-up

被引:28
作者
Vassilikos, EJK
Yu, H
Trachtenberg, J
Nam, RK
Narod, SA
Bromberg, IL
Diamandis, EP
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Sect Canc Prevent, Shreveport, LA 71105 USA
[3] Toronto Hosp, Div Urol, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Ctr Res Womens Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Lab Med & Pathobiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
prostate cancer; cancer monitoring; prostate specific antigen; ultrasensitive assay; cancer relapse; cancer cure; tumor markers;
D O I
10.1016/S0009-9120(99)00099-5
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: We have compared the ability of an ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen assay and a regular PSA assay to identify relapse and cure rates of prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy, during a 5-year follow-up period. Design and methods: We measured PSA by an ultrasensitive assay (detection limit 0.001 ng/ml) and a conventional PSA assay (detection limit 0.1 ng/mL) in serial serum samples obtained from 197 patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy. Results: Based on ultrasensitive PSA analysis, we have identified three groups of patients: 62% of patients did not show any significant changes in serum PSA; 15% of patients demonstrated slow PSA increases over time but none of the measurements exceeded 0.1 ng/mL within 4 years; and 23% of the patients had relatively significant increases of serum PSA and were classified as having 'fast relapse'. The vast majority of these patients were subsequently identified to have relapse by the regular PSA assay. The ultrasensitive PSA assay detected relapse by an average of eighteen months earlier than the conventional PSA method. Fast relapsing patients were associated with other prognostic indicators of the disease including pre-operative PSA, tumor volume, Gleason score, clinical stage, surgical margin positivity. periprostatic tissue involvement, capsular invasion and seminal vesicle invasion. The group with slowly rising PSA had prognosis which was between the patients in remission and fast relapsing patients. Conclusions: The use of ultrasensitive PSA analysis for monitoring patients after radical prostatectomy provides earlier detection of relapse (by 18 months) and identifies three distinct groups of patients. Fast relapsing patients should be good candidates for early therapeutic interventions. Copyright (C) 2000 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 123
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Statins Prevent Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Single-center Retrospective Study with a Median Follow-up of 51.20 Months
    Jarimba, Roberto
    Lima, Joao Pedroso
    Eliseu, Miguel
    Carvalho, Joao
    Antunes, Hugo
    da Silva, Edgar Tavares
    Moreira, Pedro
    Figueiredo, Arnaldo
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2020, 12 : 439 - 446
  • [32] Radical prostatectomy in Denmark: Survival analysis and temporal trends in clinicopathological parameters with up to 20 years of follow-up
    Heering, Mikael
    Berg, Kasper Drimer
    Brasso, Klaus
    Iversen, Peter
    Roder, Martin Andreas
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2017, 26 (01): : 21 - 27
  • [33] Adjuvant and Salvage Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Clarke, Noel
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Graefen, Markus
    Ost, Piet
    Zietman, Anthony Laurence
    Roach, Mack, III
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (05) : 689 - 709
  • [34] Salvage radiotherapy in patients with persisting prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Bottke, D
    Wiegel, T
    Höcht, S
    Müller, M
    Schostak, M
    Hinkelbein, W
    ONCOLOGY, 2003, 65 : 18 - 23
  • [35] Biochemical Recurrence After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in a European Single-centre Cohort with a Minimum Follow-up Time of 5 Years
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Haendler, Leif
    Nyberg, Tommy
    Gronberg, Henrik
    Nilsson, Andreas
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Hosseini, Abolfazl
    Adding, Christofer
    Jonsson, Martin
    Ploumidis, Achilles
    Egevad, Lars
    Steineck, Gunnar
    Wiklund, Peter
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (05) : 768 - 774
  • [36] Outcome of Adjuvant Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer Patients
    Suzuki, Kazumi
    Nakano, Kazuhiko
    Morita, Tatsuo
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2010, 84 (04) : 382 - 387
  • [37] Racial disparities in mortality for patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
    Wen, Wanqing
    Luckenbaugh, Amy N.
    Bayley, Christina E.
    Pension, David F.
    Shu, Xiao-Ou
    CANCER, 2021, 127 (09) : 1517 - 1528
  • [38] Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Results of a Single-institution Series with Long-term Follow-up
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Fossati, Nicola
    Stabile, Armando
    Bandini, Marco
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (02) : 289 - 292
  • [39] Intermediate term biochemical progression rates after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in patients with screen detected prostate cancer
    Krygiel, JM
    Smith, DS
    Homan, SM
    Sumner, W
    Nease, RF
    Brownson, RC
    Catalona, WJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (01) : 126 - 130
  • [40] Pathological results and rates of treatment failure in high-risk prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy
    Walz, Jochen
    Joniau, Steven
    Chun, Felix K.
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Chao-Yu, Hsu
    Klein, Eric A.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Reuther, Alwyn
    Van Poppel, Hein
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (05) : 765 - 770