Antecedents and effects of individual ambidexterity - A cross-level investigation of exploration and exploitation activities at the employee level

被引:79
作者
Schnellbaecher, Benedikt [1 ]
Heidenreich, Sven [1 ]
Wald, Andreas [2 ]
机构
[1] Saarland Univ, PO 15 11 50, D-66041 Saarbrucken, Germany
[2] Univ Adger, Sch Business & Law, Univ Veien 19, Kristiansand, Norway
关键词
Organizational ambidexterity; Individual ambidexterity; Exploration; Exploitation; Performance; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; MEDIATING ROLE; MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; INNOVATION; PARADOX; BOUNDARY; TEAMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.emj.2019.02.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
For long-term success, companies need to adapt to technological and environmental change. Organizational ambidexterity, which balances the exploration of new opportunities with the exploitation of existing capabilities, is increasingly viewed as a promising approach to tackle this challenge. However, despite the important role of individuals for firms' ambidexterity and performance, evidence on how exploration of new opportunities and exploitation of existing capabilities are triggered at an individual level and on their subsequent effects on overall performance is still lacking. Accordingly, the present research shifts the focus from organizational ambidexterity to individual ambidexterity. Based on data from 415 employees, the results of structural equation modeling show that both organizational architecture and organizational context can be used to induce individual ambidexterity. Furthermore, positive performance effects of individual ambidexterity across different organizational levels, namely the team and department levels, are confirmed. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 454
页数:13
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   SOCIAL SUPPORT AND MANAGERIAL AFFECTIVE RESPONSES TO JOB STRESS [J].
ABDELHALIM, AA .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL BEHAVIOUR, 1982, 3 (04) :281-295
[2]   Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system [J].
Adler, PS ;
Goldoftas, B ;
Levine, DI .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) :43-68
[3]   TEAMS IN PURSUIT OF RADICAL INNOVATION: A GOAL ORIENTATION PERSPECTIVE [J].
Alexander, Lameez ;
van Knippenberg, Daan .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2014, 39 (04) :423-438
[4]   BRIDGING THE BOUNDARY - EXTERNAL ACTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL TEAMS [J].
ANCONA, DG ;
CALDWELL, DF .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1992, 37 (04) :634-665
[5]   Managing Innovation Paradoxes: Ambidexterity Lessons from Leading Product Design Companies [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2010, 43 (01) :104-122
[6]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[7]  
[Anonymous], ACAD MANAGEMENT REV
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Em Handbook of creativity
[9]   Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes [J].
Argote, L ;
McEvily, B ;
Reagans, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (04) :571-582
[10]   Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation [J].
Atuahene-Gima, K .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2005, 69 (04) :61-83