Comparison of precipitation measurements by OTT Parsivel2 and Thies LPM optical disdrometers

被引:88
作者
Angulo-Martinez, Marta [1 ]
Begueria, Santiago [1 ]
Latorre, Borja [1 ]
Fernandez-Raga, Maria [2 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, EEAD, Avda Montanana 1005, E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain
[2] Univ Leon, Dept Phys, Leon, Spain
关键词
RAINDROP SIZE DISTRIBUTION; 2-DIMENSIONAL VIDEO DISDROMETER; RAINFALL KINETIC-ENERGY; DROP-SIZE; INTENSITY RELATIONSHIPS; SPLASH EROSION; SOIL-EROSION; RADAR; DISTRIBUTIONS; VELOCITY;
D O I
10.5194/hess-22-2811-2018
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Optical disdrometers are present weather sensors with the ability of providing detailed information on precipitation such as rain intensity, radar reflectivity or kinetic energy, together with discrete information on the particle size and fall velocity distribution (PSVD) of the hydrometeors. Disdrometers constitute a step forward towards a more complete characterization of precipitation, being useful in several research fields and applications. In this article the performance of two extensively used optical disdrometers, the most recent version of OTT Parsivel(2) disdrometer and Thies Clima Laser Precipitation Monitor (LPM), is evaluated. During 2 years, four collocated optical disdrometers, two Thies Clima LPM and two OTT Parsivel(2), collected up to 100 000 min of data and up to 30 000 min with rain in more than 200 rainfall events, with intensities peaking at 277 mm h(-1) in 1 minute. The analysis of these records shows significant differences between both disdrometer types for all integrated precipitation parameters, which can be explained by differences in the raw PSVD estimated by the two sensors. Thies LPM recorded a larger number of particles than Parsivel(2) and a higher proportion of small particles than OTT Parsivel(2), resulting in higher rain rates and totals and differences in radar reflectivity and kinetic energy. These differences increased greatly with rainfall intensity. Possible causes of these differences, and their practical consequences, are discussed in order to help researchers and users in the choice of sensor, and at the same time pointing out limitations to be addressed in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:2811 / 2837
页数:27
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Improvement of vertical profiles of raindrop size distribution from micro rain radar using 2D video disdrometer measurements [J].
Adirosi, E. ;
Baldini, L. ;
Roberto, N. ;
Gatlin, P. ;
Tokay, A. .
ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2016, 169 :404-415
[2]   Use of disdrometer data to evaluate the relationship of rainfall kinetic energy and intensity (KE-I) [J].
Angulo-Martinez, M. ;
Begueria, S. ;
Kysely, J. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 568 :83-94
[3]   Measurement uncertainty in rainfall kinetic energy and intensity relationships for soil erosion studies: An evaluation using PARSIVEL disdrometers in the Southern Appalachian Mountains [J].
Angulo-Martinez, M. ;
Barros, A. P. .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2015, 228 :28-40
[4]   Splash erosion under natural rainfall on three soil types in NE Spain [J].
Angulo-Martinez, M. ;
Begueria, S. ;
Navas, A. ;
Machin, J. .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2012, 175 :38-44
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
[6]   Systematic variation of drop size and radar-rainfall relations [J].
Atlas, D ;
Ulbrich, CW ;
Marks, FD ;
Amitai, E ;
Williams, CR .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D6) :6155-6169
[7]   PARSIVEL Snow Observations: A Critical Assessment [J].
Battaglia, Alessandro ;
Rustemeier, Elke ;
Tokay, Ali ;
Blahak, Ulrich ;
Simmer, Clemens .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 27 (02) :333-344
[8]  
BEARD KV, 1976, J ATMOS SCI, V33, P851, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<0851:TVASOC>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]  
Bloemink H. I., 2005, WMO TECHN C MET ENV, P3