Economic evaluation of environmental externalities in China's coal-fired power generation

被引:39
作者
Zhao, Xiaoli [1 ]
Cai, Qiong [2 ]
Ma, Chunbo [3 ]
Hu, Yanan [4 ]
Luo, Kaiyan [2 ]
Li, William [5 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Sch Business Adm, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Agr & Resource Econ, Ctr Environm Econ & Policy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[4] Kunshan China Resources City Gas Co Ltd, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[5] Swarthmore Coll, 500 Coll Ave, Swarthmore, PA 19081 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Coal-fired power industry; Environmental externalities; Willingness to pay; China; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; CONTINGENT VALUATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CHEAP TALK; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; ELECTRICITY; DESIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.030
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Serious environmental externalities exist in China's power industry. Environmental economics theory suggests that the evaluation of environmental externality is the basis of designing an efficient regulation. The purposes of this study are: (1) to identify Chinese respondents' preferences for green development of electric power industry and the socio-economic characteristics behind them; (2) to investigate the different attitudes of the respondents towards pollution and CO2 reduction; (3) to quantitatively evaluate the environmental cost of China's coal-fired power generation. Based on the method of choice experiments (CE) and the 411 questionnaires with 2466 data points, we found that Chinese respondents prefer PM2.5, SO2 and NOx reduction to CO2 reduction and that the environment cost of coal-fired power plants in China is 0.30 yuan per kWh. In addition, we found that the socioeconomic characteristics of income, education, gender, and environmental awareness have significant impacts on respondents' choices. These findings indicate that the environmental cost of coal-fired power generation is a significant factor that requires great consideration in the formulation of electric power development policies. In addition, importance should also be attached to the implementation of green power price policy and enhancement of environmental protection awareness.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 317
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[11]  
Diaz-Rainey I., 2007, WORKING PAPER
[12]   Wind farms - Where and how to place them? A choice experiment approach to measure consumer preferences for characteristics of wind farm establishments in Sweden [J].
Ek, Kristina ;
Persson, Lars .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 105 :193-203
[13]   Many ways to say 'no', different ways to say 'yes': Applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals [J].
Ellis, Geraint ;
Barry, John ;
Robinson, Clive .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 50 (04) :517-551
[14]   Externalities of biomass based electricity production compared with power generation from coal in the Netherlands [J].
Faaij, A ;
Meuleman, B ;
Turkenburg, W ;
van Wijk, A ;
Bauen, A ;
Rosillo-Calle, F ;
Hall, D .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1998, 14 (02) :125-147
[15]   A choice experiment study for land-use scenarios in semi-arid watershed environments [J].
Garcia-Llorente, M. ;
Martin-Lopez, B. ;
Nunes, P. A. L. D. ;
Castro, A. J. ;
Montes, C. .
JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2012, 87 :219-230
[16]   Impact of a possible environmental externalities internalisation on energy prices: The case of the greenhouse gases from the Greek electricity sector [J].
Georgakellos, Dimitrios A. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (01) :202-209
[17]  
Gordon J, 2001, NEW HOR ENV ECO, P73
[18]   Valuing environmental impacts of large dam construction in Korea: An application of choice experiments [J].
Han, Sang-Yong ;
Kwak, Seung-Jun ;
Yoo, Seung-Hoon .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2008, 28 (4-5) :256-266
[19]   MARGINAL WELFARE MEASURES FOR DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS [J].
HANEMANN, WM .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1983, 13 (2-3) :129-136