Prostate MRI: Evaluating Tumor Volume and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as Surrogate Biomarkers for Predicting Tumor Gleason Score

被引:66
|
作者
Donati, Olivio F. [1 ,3 ]
Afaq, Asim [4 ]
Vargas, Hebert Alberto [1 ]
Mazaheri, Yousef [2 ]
Zheng, Junting [2 ]
Moskowitz, Chaya S. [2 ]
Hricak, Hedvig [1 ]
Akin, Oguz [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Coll London Hosp, Biomed Res Ctr, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Inst Nucl Med, London, England
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; CANCER CORRELATION; FIELD-STRENGTH; 3; T; AGGRESSIVENESS; GRADE; ADENOCARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS; SPREAD;
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0044
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate whether tumor volume derived from apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps (Volume(ADC)) and tumor mean ADC value (ADC(mean)) are independent predictors of prostate tumor Gleason score (GS). Experimental Design: Tumor volume and GS were recorded from whole-mount histopathology for 131 men (median age, 60 years) who underwent endorectal diffusion-weighted MRI for local staging of prostate cancer before prostatectomy. Volume(ADC) and ADC(mean) were derived from ADC maps and correlated with histopathologic tumor volume and GS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate prediction of tumor aggressiveness. Areas under receiver-operating characteristics curves (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the performance of Volume(ADC) and ADC(mean) in discriminating tumors of GS 6 and GS >= 7. Results: Histopathology identified 116 tumor foci >0.5 mL. Volume(ADC) correlated significantly with histopathologic tumor volume (rho = 0.683). The correlation increased with increasing GS (rho = 0.453 for GS 6 tumors; rho = 0.643 for GS 7 tumors; rho = 0.980 for GS >= 8 tumors). Both Volume(ADC) (rho = 0.286) and ADC(mean) (rho = -0.309) correlated with GS. At univariate analysis, both Volume(ADC) (P = 0.0325) and ADC(mean) (P = 0.0033) could differentiate GS 6 from GS >= 7 tumor foci. However, at multivariate analysis, only ADC(mean) (P = 0.0156) was a significant predictor of tumor aggressiveness (i. e., GS 6 vs. GS >= 7). For differentiating GS 6 from GS >= 7 tumors, AUCs were 0.644 and 0.704 for Volume(ADC) and ADC(mean), respectively, and 0.749 for both parameters combined. Conclusion: In patients with prostate cancer, ADC(mean) is an independent predictor of tumor aggressiveness, but Volume(ADC) is not. The latter parameter adds little to the ADC(mean) in predicting tumor GS. (C)2014 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:3705 / 3711
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diffusion-Weighted and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Prostate Cancer: Correlation of Quantitative MR Parameters With Gleason Score and Tumor Angiogenesis
    Oto, Aytekin
    Yang, Cheng
    Kayhan, Arda
    Tretiakova, Maria
    Antic, Tatjana
    Schmid-Tannwald, Christine
    Eggener, Scott
    Karczmar, Gregory S.
    Stadler, Walter M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (06) : 1382 - 1390
  • [42] MYC DNA Methylation in Prostate Tumor Tissue is Associated with Gleason Score
    Barry, Kathryn Hughes
    Mohanty, Kareshma
    Erickson, Patricia A.
    Wang, Difei
    Shi, Jianxin
    Rose, Gary
    Cellini, Ashley
    Clark, Kimberly
    Ambulos, Nicholas, Jr.
    Yin, Jing
    Yan, Liying
    Poulin, Matthew
    Meyer, Ann
    Zhang, Yuji
    Bentzen, Soren M.
    Burke, Allen
    Hussain, Arif
    Berndt, Sonja I.
    GENES, 2021, 12 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [43] Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer Using the Combination of Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Across Tumor Diffusion Volume and Clinical Information: A Pilot Study
    Zhang, Zhao
    Xu, Huazhi
    Xue, Yingnan
    Li, Jiance
    Ye, Qiong
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 49 (02) : 556 - 564
  • [44] Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with tumor cellularity and tumor grade
    Kishimoto, Keiko
    Tajima, Shinya
    Maeda, Ichiro
    Takagi, Masayuki
    Ueno, Takahiko
    Suzuki, Nao
    Nakajima, Yasuo
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2016, 57 (08) : 1021 - 1028
  • [45] Minimum Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values and Neuroepithelial Tumor Grading
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (03) : 755 - 755
  • [46] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: a quantitative parameter for in vivo tumor characterization
    Herneth, AM
    Guccione, S
    Bednarski, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 45 (03) : 208 - 213
  • [47] Quantitative evaluation of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict higher Gleason score prostate cancer
    Kato, Seiji
    Kamijima, Shuichi
    Inaoka, Tsutomu
    Kamiya, Naoto
    Sasai, Daisuke
    Terada, Hitoshi
    Hiruta, Nobuyuki
    Suzuki, Hiroyoshi
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 52 (03) : 180 - 185
  • [48] Complementary value of pre-treatment apparent diffusion coefficient in rectal cancer for predicting tumor recurrence
    Moon, Sung Jun
    Cho, Seung Hyun
    Kim, Gab Chul
    Kim, Won Hwa
    Kim, Hye Jung
    Shin, Kyung-Min
    Lee, So Mi
    Park, Jun Seok
    Choi, Gyu-Seog
    Kim, See Hyung
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (07) : 1237 - 1244
  • [49] The value of whole tumor apparent diffusion coefficient histogram parameters in predicting meningiomas progesterone receptor expression
    Zhao, Zhiyong
    Zhang, Jinglong
    Yuan, Shuai
    Zhang, He
    Yin, Hang
    Wang, Gang
    Pan, Yawen
    Li, Qiang
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2024, 47 (01)
  • [50] Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in predicting pathological T stage in patients with thymic epithelial tumor
    Chao-Chun Chang
    Chia-Ying Lin
    Li-Ting Huang
    Ming-Tsung Chuang
    Ying-Hung Lu
    Wei-Li Huang
    Ying-Yuan Chen
    Wu-Wei Lai
    Yau-Lin Tseng
    Yi-Ting Yen
    Cancer Imaging, 22