Prostate MRI: Evaluating Tumor Volume and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as Surrogate Biomarkers for Predicting Tumor Gleason Score

被引:66
|
作者
Donati, Olivio F. [1 ,3 ]
Afaq, Asim [4 ]
Vargas, Hebert Alberto [1 ]
Mazaheri, Yousef [2 ]
Zheng, Junting [2 ]
Moskowitz, Chaya S. [2 ]
Hricak, Hedvig [1 ]
Akin, Oguz [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Coll London Hosp, Biomed Res Ctr, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Inst Nucl Med, London, England
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; CANCER CORRELATION; FIELD-STRENGTH; 3; T; AGGRESSIVENESS; GRADE; ADENOCARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS; SPREAD;
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0044
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate whether tumor volume derived from apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps (Volume(ADC)) and tumor mean ADC value (ADC(mean)) are independent predictors of prostate tumor Gleason score (GS). Experimental Design: Tumor volume and GS were recorded from whole-mount histopathology for 131 men (median age, 60 years) who underwent endorectal diffusion-weighted MRI for local staging of prostate cancer before prostatectomy. Volume(ADC) and ADC(mean) were derived from ADC maps and correlated with histopathologic tumor volume and GS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate prediction of tumor aggressiveness. Areas under receiver-operating characteristics curves (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the performance of Volume(ADC) and ADC(mean) in discriminating tumors of GS 6 and GS >= 7. Results: Histopathology identified 116 tumor foci >0.5 mL. Volume(ADC) correlated significantly with histopathologic tumor volume (rho = 0.683). The correlation increased with increasing GS (rho = 0.453 for GS 6 tumors; rho = 0.643 for GS 7 tumors; rho = 0.980 for GS >= 8 tumors). Both Volume(ADC) (rho = 0.286) and ADC(mean) (rho = -0.309) correlated with GS. At univariate analysis, both Volume(ADC) (P = 0.0325) and ADC(mean) (P = 0.0033) could differentiate GS 6 from GS >= 7 tumor foci. However, at multivariate analysis, only ADC(mean) (P = 0.0156) was a significant predictor of tumor aggressiveness (i. e., GS 6 vs. GS >= 7). For differentiating GS 6 from GS >= 7 tumors, AUCs were 0.644 and 0.704 for Volume(ADC) and ADC(mean), respectively, and 0.749 for both parameters combined. Conclusion: In patients with prostate cancer, ADC(mean) is an independent predictor of tumor aggressiveness, but Volume(ADC) is not. The latter parameter adds little to the ADC(mean) in predicting tumor GS. (C)2014 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:3705 / 3711
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diffusion-Weighted MRI of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Tumor Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Gleason Score and Percentage of Tumor on Core Biopsy
    Woodfield, Courtney A.
    Tung, Glenn A.
    Grand, David J.
    Pezzullo, John A.
    Machan, Jason T.
    Renzulli, Joseph F., II
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (04) : W316 - W322
  • [3] Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient ratio on 3.0 T MRI with prostate cancer Gleason score
    Rajeev, Jyoti
    Pankaj, Jain Tarun
    Hodo, Haxhimolla
    Heath, Liddell
    Edward, Barrett Sean
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2018, 5 : 58 - 63
  • [4] A prospective study evaluating indirect MRI-signs for the prediction of extraprostatic disease in patients with prostate cancer: tumor volume, tumor contact length and tumor apparent diffusion coefficient
    Rud, Erik
    Diep, Lien
    Baco, Eduard
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (04) : 629 - 637
  • [5] A prospective study evaluating indirect MRI-signs for the prediction of extraprostatic disease in patients with prostate cancer: tumor volume, tumor contact length and tumor apparent diffusion coefficient
    Erik Rud
    Lien Diep
    Eduard Baco
    World Journal of Urology, 2018, 36 : 629 - 637
  • [6] Monitoring Tumor Volume in Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Active Surveillance: Is MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Indicative of Tumor Growth?
    Morgan, Veronica A.
    Parker, Christopher
    MacDonald, Alison
    Thomas, Karen
    deSouza, Nandita M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (03) : 620 - 628
  • [7] Prostate tumor eccentricity predicts Gleason score better than prostate tumor volume
    Mayer, Rulon
    Simone, Charles B., II
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 12 (02) : 1096 - 1108
  • [8] Roles of the apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor volume in predicting tumor grade in patients with choroid plexus tumors
    Sasaki, Tomoaki
    Kim, John
    Moritani, Toshio
    Capizzano, Aristides A.
    Sato, Shawn P.
    Sato, Yutaka
    Kirby, Patricia
    Ishitoya, Shunta
    Oya, Akiko
    Toda, Masahiro
    Yuzawa, Sayaka
    Takahashi, Koji
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2018, 60 (05) : 479 - 486
  • [9] Roles of the apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor volume in predicting tumor grade in patients with choroid plexus tumors
    Tomoaki Sasaki
    John Kim
    Toshio Moritani
    Aristides A. Capizzano
    Shawn P. Sato
    Yutaka Sato
    Patricia Kirby
    Shunta Ishitoya
    Akiko Oya
    Masahiro Toda
    Sayaka Yuzawa
    Koji Takahashi
    Neuroradiology, 2018, 60 : 479 - 486
  • [10] Evaluating the Prognostic Impact of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Definitive Radiotherapy for Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer Patients
    Onal, Cem
    Elmali, Aysenur
    Erbay, Gurcan
    Demirhan, Birhan
    Sutera, Philip
    Deek, Matthew P.
    Tran, Phuoc T.
    Guler, Ozan Cem
    PROSTATE, 2025, 85 (04): : 344 - 353