Umbilical artery Doppler waveform notching - Is it a marker for cord and placental abnormalities?

被引:10
作者
Abuhamad, A
Sclater, AJ
Carlson, EJ
Moriarity, RP
Aguiar, MA
机构
[1] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
[2] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Dept Pathol, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
关键词
cord abnormalities; Doppler imaging; notching; placental abnormalities; umbilical artery;
D O I
10.7863/jum.2002.21.8.857
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate in a prospective, controlled fashion the prevalence of umbilical artery Doppler waveform notching and its association with cord and placental abnormalities. Methods. During a 6-month period, umbilical artery velocity waveforms were prospectively obtained on 1857 pregnancies at greater than 27 weeks' gestation. All pregnant patients with the presence of a persistent fetal umbilical artery waveform notch formed the study population (cases). Control patients, matched for gestational age, with normal umbilical artery waveforms, were selected for comparison (2 controls per case). After deliver 6 detailed pathologic examination was performed on all umbilical cords and placentas. Results. The presence of an umbilical artery waveform notch was noted in 29 (1.6%) of 1857 pregnancies. Postnatal placental evaluation showed the presence of an accessory placental lobe in 5 (17%) of 29 cases compared with 1 (1.8%) of 54 controls (P = .018). Overall, the presence of an umbilical artery waveform notch was associated with umbilical cord abnormalities in 21 (72%) of 29 cases compared with 8 (14%) of 54 controls (odds ratio, 15; 95% confidence interval, 4.4-54.4). Conclusions. Umbilical artery waveform notching appears to be a strong predictor of cord and placental abnormalities. This finding may have important clinical implications.
引用
收藏
页码:857 / 860
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Does increased resistance on umbilical artery Doppler preclude a trial of labour? [J].
Skinner, J ;
Greene, RA ;
Gardeil, F ;
Stuart, B ;
Turner, MJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1998, 79 (01) :35-38
[32]   Blood gas profiles of fetuses with abnormal Doppler flow in the umbilical artery [J].
Okamura, K ;
Watanabe, T ;
Ando, J ;
Yajima, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1996, 13 (05) :297-300
[33]   DOPPLER VELOCIMETRY AND UMBILICAL-CORD BLOOD-GAS ASSESSMENT OF TWINS [J].
JENSEN, OHR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1993, 49 (03) :155-159
[34]   PLACENTAL MORPHOLOGY IN RELATION TO UMBILICAL ARTERY BLOOD VELOCITY WAVE-FORMS [J].
NORDENVALL, M ;
ULLBERG, U ;
LAURIN, J ;
LINGMAN, G ;
SANDSTEDT, B ;
ULMSTEN, U .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1991, 40 (03) :179-190
[35]   Variation in Doppler indices along the length of the cord from the intraabdominal to the placental insertion [J].
Khare, Manjiri ;
Paul, Sanjoy ;
Konje, Justin C. .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (08) :922-928
[36]   Incidence and Management of Umbilical Artery Flow Abnormalities during Open Fetal Surgery [J].
Sinskey, Jina L. ;
Rollins, Mark D. ;
Whitlock, Elizabeth ;
Moon-Grady, Anita J. ;
Vu, Lan ;
Feiner, John R. ;
Ferschl, Marla B. .
FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2018, 43 (04) :274-283
[37]   Venous Doppler in the fetus with absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery [J].
Gudmundsson, S ;
Tulzer, G ;
Huhta, JC ;
Marsal, K .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 7 (04) :262-267
[38]   A RANDOM SINGLE DOPPLER STUDY OF THE UMBILICAL ARTERY IN THE EVALUATION OF PREGNANCIES COMPLICATED BY DIABETES [J].
BENAMI, M ;
BATTINO, S ;
GESLEVICH, Y ;
SHALEV, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1995, 12 (06) :437-438
[39]   Application of FFT-analyzed umbilical artery doppler signals to fuzzy algorithm [J].
Hardalaç F. ;
Biri A. ;
Sucak A. .
Journal of Medical Systems, 2004, 28 (6) :549-559
[40]   Is there a relationship between estimated fetal weight and umbilical artery Doppler impedance indices? [J].
Owen, P ;
Murphy, J ;
Farrell, T .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 22 (02) :157-159