Introduction: Theorizing the civic turn in European integration policies

被引:38
作者
Mouritsen, Per [1 ]
Jensen, Kristian K. [2 ]
Larin, Stephen J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Bartholins Alle 7, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Queens Univ, Dept Polit Studies, Kingston, ON, Canada
关键词
Civic integration; civic turn; immigrant integration; citizenship; national models; nationalism; convergence; theory; CITIZENSHIP; MULTICULTURALISM; LIBERALISM; DIVERSITY; POLITICS; IMMIGRANTS; COMMUNITY; RETREAT; PROMOTE; VALUES;
D O I
10.1177/1468796819843532
中图分类号
C95 [民族学、文化人类学];
学科分类号
0304 ; 030401 ;
摘要
Many authors have written about the 'civic turn' in European immigrant integration politics and policies that began in the late 1990s, but few have focused on the conceptual or normative dimensions of this turn. The purpose of this special issue is to help correct this situation. In this substantive introductory article, we begin with a discussion of the 'convergence or national models' debate that dominated early work on the subject. The next section presents the argument that civic integration is best understood as an ideological turn. It expands 'good citizenship' into personal conduct and values, shifts the responsibility for integration from the state to individuals and institutionalizes incentivizing and disciplining integration processes, which are often really just a means of migration control. This is accompanied, we argue, by a civic nationalist conception of membership that appeals to shared political values but defines those values through the culture of the state's national majority. We then move on to the mechanisms and effects of civic integration, followed by a discussion of its normative analysis, before finally summarizing the articles included in this special issue and how they address the concerns that we have raised.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 613
页数:19
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, CITIZENSHIP SOCIAL C
[2]   Is there really a retreat from multiculturalism policies? New evidence from the multiculturalism policy index [J].
Banting, Keith ;
Kymlicka, Will .
COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2013, 11 (05) :577-598
[3]  
Baubock R, 2010, 412010 RSCAS EUR U I
[4]  
Bennett Tony., 2009, Culture, Class Distinction, DOI [10.4324/9780203930571, DOI 10.4324/9780203930571]
[5]  
Berman BJ, 2016, MORAL EC ETHNIC NATL
[6]   Political Debates on Islamic Headscarves and Civic Integration Abroad in France and the Netherlands: What Can Models Explain? [J].
Bonjour, Saskia ;
Lettinga, Doutje .
JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE STUDIES, 2012, 10 (03) :260-278
[7]  
Breidahl K., 2017, COMP MIGR STUD, V5, P1
[8]   Do shared values promote social cohesion? If so, which? Evidence from Denmark [J].
Breidahl, Karen N. ;
Holtug, Nils ;
Kongshoj, Kristian .
EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2018, 10 (01) :97-118
[9]  
Brubaker Rogers., 1992, Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany
[10]   Super-diversity vs. assimilation: how complex diversity in majority-minority cities challenges the assumptions of assimilation [J].
Crul, Maurice .
JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES, 2016, 42 (01) :54-68