Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda

被引:93
作者
Hamilton, Jada G. [1 ]
Abdiwahab, Ekland [2 ]
Edwards, Heather M. [3 ]
Fang, Min-Lin [4 ]
Jdayani, Andrew [5 ]
Breslau, Erica S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Patient Ctr Outcomes Res Inst, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, UCSF Lib, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Torrance Mem Hlth Syst, Torrance Hlth IPA, Torrance, CA USA
[6] NCI, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, Healthcare Delivery Res Program, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
primary care; knowledge; health beliefs; communication; cancer; genetic testing; BRCA-RELATED CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; HEREDITARY BREAST; RISK-ASSESSMENT; PROSTATE-CANCER; COLORECTAL-CANCER; CLINICAL PRACTICES; EDUCATIONAL-NEEDS; FAMILY-HISTORY; OVARIAN-CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-016-3943-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Primary care providers (PCPs) can play a critical role in helping patients receive the preventive health benefits of cancer genetic risk information. Thus, the objective of this systematic review was to identify studies of US PCPs' knowledge, attitudes, and communication-related behaviors regarding genetic tests that could inform risk-stratification approaches for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening in order to describe current findings and research gaps. We conducted a systematic search of six electronic databases to identify peer-reviewed empirical articles relating to US PCPs and genetic testing for breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer published in English from 2008 to 2016. We reviewed these data and used narrative synthesis methods to integrate findings into a descriptive summary and identify research needs. We identified 27 relevant articles. Most focused on genetic testing for breast cancer (23/27) and colorectal cancer risk (12/27); only one study examined testing for prostate cancer risk. Most articles addressed descriptive research questions (24/27). Many studies (24/27) documented PCPs' knowledge, often concluding that providers' knowledge was incomplete. Studies commonly (11/27) examined PCPs' attitudes. Across studies, PCPs expressed some concerns about ethical, legal, and social implications of testing. Attitudes about the utility of clinical genetic testing, including for targeted cancer screening, were generally favorable; PCPs were more skeptical of direct-to-consumer testing. Relatively fewer studies (9/27) examined PCPs' communication practices regarding cancer genetic testing. This review indicates a need for investigators to move beyond descriptive research questions related to PCPs' knowledge and attitudes about cancer genetic testing. Research is needed to address important gaps regarding the development, testing, and implementation of innovative interventions and educational programs that can improve PCPs' genetic testing knowledge, assuage concerns about the appropriateness of cancer genetic testing, and promote open and effective patient-provider communication about genetic risk and genetic testing.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 324
页数:10
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Public Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Findings from the 2013 US Health Information National Trends Survey [J].
Agurs-Collins, Tanya ;
Ferrer, Rebecca ;
Ottenbacher, Allison ;
Waters, Erika A. ;
O'Connell, Mary E. ;
Hamilton, Jada G. .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2015, 30 (04) :799-807
[2]   The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes [J].
Amara, Nabil ;
Blouin-Bougie, Jolyane ;
Jbilou, Jalila ;
Halilem, Norrin ;
Simard, Jacques ;
Landry, Rejean .
FAMILIAL CANCER, 2016, 15 (01) :1-17
[3]  
American College of Preventive Medicine, GEN TEST CLIN REF CL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Survivorship
[5]   Evidence-Based Guidelines for Precision Risk Stratification-Based Screening (PRSBS) for Colorectal Cancer: Lessons Learned from the US Armed Forces: Consensus and Future Directions [J].
Avital, Itzhak ;
Langan, Russell C. ;
Summers, Thomas A. ;
Steele, Scott R. ;
Waldman, Scott A. ;
Backman, Vadim ;
Yee, Judy ;
Nissan, Aviram ;
Young, Patrick ;
Womeldorph, Craig ;
Mancusco, Paul ;
Mueller, Renee ;
Noto, Khristian ;
Grundfest, Warren ;
Bilchik, Anton J. ;
Protic, Mladjan ;
Daumer, Martin ;
Eberhardt, John ;
Man, Yan Gao ;
Bruecher, Bjoern L. D. M. ;
Stojadinovic, Alexander .
JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 4 (03) :172-192
[6]   Familial Risk of Cancer and Knowledge and Use of Genetic Testing [J].
Baer, Heather J. ;
Brawarsky, Phyllis ;
Murray, Michael F. ;
Haas, Jennifer S. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 25 (07) :717-724
[7]   Impact of a Randomized Controlled Educational Trial to Improve Physician Practice Behaviors Around Screening for Inherited Breast Cancer [J].
Bell, Robert A. ;
McDermott, Haley ;
Fancher, Tonya L. ;
Green, Michael J. ;
Day, Frank C. ;
Wilkes, Michael S. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 (03) :334-341
[8]   Prevalence and Healthcare Actions of Women in a Large Health System with a Family History Meeting the 2005 USPSTF Recommendation for BRCA Genetic Counseling Referral [J].
Bellcross, Cecelia A. ;
Leadbetter, Steven ;
Alford, Sharon Hensley ;
Peipins, Lucy A. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2013, 22 (04) :728-735
[9]   Awareness and Utilization of BRCA1/2 Testing Among US Primary Care Physicians [J].
Bellcross, Cecelia A. ;
Kolor, Katherine ;
Goddard, Katrina A. B. ;
Coates, Ralph J. ;
Reyes, Michele ;
Khoury, Muin J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 40 (01) :61-66
[10]  
Berg AO, 2009, GENET MED, V11, P35, DOI [10.1097/GIM.0b013e318181fa2ff, 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31818fa2ff]