Complementarity and bargaining power

被引:10
作者
Richards, Timothy J. [1 ]
Bonnet, Celine [2 ,3 ]
Bouamra-Mechemache, Zohra [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Toulouse Sch Econ, Toulouse, France
[3] INRA, Paris, France
关键词
bargaining power; complementary goods; Nash-in-Nash equilibrium; retailing; soft drinks; vertical relationships; CROSS-CATEGORY; PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION; PURCHASE INCIDENCE; CHOICE; MODEL; COMPETITION; BASKET; MANUFACTURERS; ENDOGENEITY; CONTRACTS;
D O I
10.1093/erae/jbx032
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Bargaining power in vertical channels depends critically on the 'disagreement profit' or the opportunity cost to each player should negotiations fail. In a multiproduct context, disagreement profit depends on the degree of substitutability among the products offered by the downstream retailer. We develop an empirical framework that is able to estimate the effect of retail complementarity on bargaining power, and margins earned by manufacturers and retailers in the French soft-drink industry. We show that complementarity increases the strength of retailers' bargaining position, so their share of the total margin increases by almost 28 per cent relative to the nocomplementarity case.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 331
页数:35
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Empirical models of manufacturer-retailer interaction: A review and agenda for future research [J].
Ailawadi, Kusum L. ;
Bradlow, Eric T. ;
Draganska, Michaela ;
Nijs, Vincent ;
Rooderkerk, Robert P. ;
Sudhir, K. ;
Wilbur, Kenneth C. ;
Zhang, Jie .
MARKETING LETTERS, 2010, 21 (03) :273-285
[2]  
[Anonymous], EUROPEAN REV AGR EC
[3]  
Autorite de la concurrence, 2015, AV 15 A 06 31 MARS 2
[4]   On the Consumer Value of Complementarity: A Benefit Function Approach [J].
Baggio, Michele ;
Chavas, Jean-Paul .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 91 (02) :489-502
[5]   Determining where to shop: Fixed and variable costs of shopping [J].
Bell, DR ;
Ho, TH ;
Tang, CS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (03) :352-369
[6]   Shopping behavior and consumer preference for store price format: Why "large basket" shoppers prefer EDLP [J].
Bell, DR ;
Lattin, JM .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1998, 17 (01) :66-88
[7]  
BESAG J, 1974, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V36, P192
[8]  
Bhat C. R., 2012, WORKING PAPER
[9]   THE NASH BARGAINING SOLUTION IN ECONOMIC MODELING [J].
BINMORE, K ;
RUBINSTEIN, A ;
WOLINSKY, A .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1986, 17 (02) :176-188
[10]  
Bonnet C., 2015, WORKING PAPER