Coupling activity coefficient models, Henry constant equations, and equations of state to calculate vapor-liquid and solid-liquid equilibrium data

被引:7
作者
Ferrando, N. [1 ]
Lugo, R. [1 ]
Mougin, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] IFP Energies Nouvelles, Dept Thermodyman & Modelisat Mol, F-92852 Rueil Malmaison, France
关键词
activity models; Henry's constants; equation of state; gas solubility; solid/liquid equilibrium;
D O I
10.1016/j.cep.2006.03.003
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The sour gas sequestration problems require the knowledge of the gas solubility in brines. Phase equilibrium involving very diluted species as dissolved gas molecules in water or in electrolytic solutions are commonly modeled by a heterogeneous approach needing an activity model coupled to a Henry's constant for the aqueous phase and an equation of state (EOS) for the vapor phase. Because models contain assumptions and parameters fitted in specific conditions, it is necessary to ensure that the coupling of these different elements is consistent. In this work, after having separately tested three activity models (the Pitzer model, a Bromley model parameterized by Jager and the extended Uniquac model) on a freezing-point water depression calculation in the presence of thermodynamic inhibitors, different couplings with Henry's constant (Dhima, Duan, and Shock and Helgeson equations) and with two EOS (Soave-Redlich-Kong and Peng-Robinson) are carried out. The comparison of these different associations highlights the role of interaction parameters, Henry's constant and EOS on the CH4 and CO2 solubility calculation in electrolytic solutions. It is shown that if it is naturally preferable to use the same conditions as those used for the fitting of the activity model parameters to get the best reliability in predictions, a good accuracy can also be obtained by coupling rigorously different approaches. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 782
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
BROMLEY L, 1987, AICHE J, V19, P313
[2]  
CARDOSO MJED, 1987, FLUID PHASE EQUILIBR, V33, P315, DOI 10.1016/0378-3812(87)85043-4
[3]  
*CRC PRESS INC, 1999, CRC HDB CHEM PHYS
[4]  
DHIMA A, 1998, THESIS U C BERNARD L
[5]   An improved model calculating CO2 solubility in pure water and aqueous NaCl solutions from 273 to 533 K and from 0 to 2000 bar [J].
Duan, ZH ;
Sun, R .
CHEMICAL GEOLOGY, 2003, 193 (3-4) :257-271
[6]   THE PREDICTION OF METHANE SOLUBILITY IN NATURAL-WATERS TO HIGH IONIC-STRENGTH FROM O-DEGREES-C TO 250-DEGREES-C AND FROM 0 TO 1600 BAR [J].
DUAN, ZH ;
MOLLER, N ;
GREENBERG, J ;
WEARE, JH .
GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1992, 56 (04) :1451-1460
[7]   AN EQUATION OF STATE FOR THE CH4-CO2-H2O SYSTEM .1. PURE SYSTEMS FROM 0-DEGREES-C TO 1000-DEGREES-C AND 0 TO 8000 BAR [J].
DUAN, ZH ;
MOLLER, N ;
WEARE, JH .
GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1992, 56 (07) :2605-2617
[8]   Patterns of solid-fluid phase equilibria: new possibilities? [J].
Garcia, DC ;
Luks, KD .
FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 1999, 161 (01) :91-106
[10]   The next generation of hydrate prediction - II. Dedicated aqueous phase fugacity model for hydrate prediction [J].
Jager, MD ;
Ballard, AL ;
Sloan, ED .
FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 2003, 211 (01) :85-107