Development of a global computable general equilibrium model coupled with detailed energy end-use technology

被引:113
作者
Fujimori, Shinichiro [1 ]
Mosui, Toshihiko [1 ]
Matsuoka, Yuzuru [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Ctr Social & Environm Syst Res, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Dept Urban & Environm Engn, Nishikyo Ku, Kyoto 6068540, Japan
关键词
Computable general equilibrium model; Energy end-use technologies; Integrated assessment model; Hybrid model; BOTTOM-UP; TOP-DOWN; SCENARIOS; STABILIZATION; ABATEMENT; IMPACTS; PATHWAY; CARBON; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.074
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
A global computable general equilibrium (CGE) model integrating detailed energy end-use technologies is developed in this paper. The paper (1) presents how energy end-use technologies are treated within the model and (2) analyzes the characteristics of the model's behavior. Energy service demand and end-use technologies are explicitly considered, and the share of technologies is determined by a discrete probabilistic function, namely a Logit function, to meet the energy service demand. Coupling with detailed technology information enables the CGE model to have more realistic representation in the energy consumption. The proposed model in this paper is compared with the aggregated traditional model under the same assumptions in scenarios with and without mitigation roughly consistent with the two degree climate mitigation target. Although the results of aggregated energy supply and greenhouse gas emissions are similar, there are three main differences between the aggregated and the detailed technologies models. First, GDP losses in mitigation scenarios are lower in the detailed technology model (2.8% in 2050) as compared with the aggregated model (3.2%). Second, price elasticity and autonomous energy efficiency improvement are heterogeneous across regions and sectors in the detailed technology model, whereas the traditional aggregated model generally utilizes a single value for each of these variables. Third, the magnitude of emissions reduction and factors (energy intensity and carbon factor reduction) related to climate mitigation also varies among sectors in the detailed technology model. The household sector in the detailed technology model has a relatively higher reduction for both energy intensity and the carbon factor. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 306
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]  
Dimaranan B.V., 2006, GLOBAL TRADE ASSISTA
[12]  
Drouet L, 2005, GERAD 25TH ANNIV SER, V3, P27
[13]  
Fisher B, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P169
[14]   Development of method for estimation of world industrial energy consumption and its application [J].
Fujimori, Shinichiro ;
Matsuoka, Yuzuru .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (03) :461-473
[15]   Climate Change Impact and Adaptation Assessment on Food Consumption Utilizing a New Scenario Framework [J].
Hasegawa, Tomoko ;
Fujimori, Shinichiro ;
Shin, Yonghee ;
Takahashi, Kiyoshi ;
Masui, Toshihiko ;
Tanaka, Akemi .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (01) :438-445
[16]   Global biofuel production and poverty in China [J].
Huang, Jikun ;
Yang, Jun ;
Msangi, Siwa ;
Rozelle, Scott ;
Weersink, Alfons .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 98 :246-255
[17]  
IIASA, 2012, SHAR SOC PATHW SSP D
[18]   Is atmospheric carbon dioxide removal a game changer for climate change mitigation? [J].
Kriegler, Elmar ;
Edenhofer, Ottmar ;
Reuster, Lena ;
Luderer, Gunnar ;
Klein, David .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 118 (01) :45-57
[19]   Distributional impacts of taxing carbon in China: Results from the CEEPA model [J].
Liang, Qiao-Mei ;
Wei, Yi-Ming .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 92 :545-551
[20]  
Lofgren H., 2002, A Standard Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model in GAMS