Cooperation between general practitioners and occupational health physicians in Germany: how can it be optimised? A qualitative study

被引:25
作者
Mosshammer, Dirk [1 ]
Natanzon, Iris [2 ]
Manske, Ira [1 ]
Grutschkowski, Philipp [3 ]
Rieger, Monika A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen Hosp, Div Gen Practice Family Med, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Dept Gen Practice & Hlth Serv Res, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Tubingen Hosp, Inst Occupat & Social Med & Hlth Serv Res, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Cooperation; General practice; Occupational medicine; Cooperative behaviour; CARE; REHABILITATION; MEDICINE; WORK;
D O I
10.1007/s00420-013-0845-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose General practitioners (GPs) and occupational health physicians (OPs) have several overlapping work fields, such as important functions in prevention, rehabilitation and reintegration into the workplace. In Germany, however, cooperation between GP and OP is often lacking or suboptimal. In this article, we analysed the suggestions for optimisation of cooperation. Methods Three focus groups were interviewed: GP, OP and medical doctors working in both fields. A qualitative content analysis was performed. Results Categories of suggestions could be assigned to five issues: the "Systemic View" concerning the state and/or employer (e. g. the system of remuneration for GPs), "Inter-collegial Contact" (e. g. fostering "friendly exchanges" between both groups), "Medical Education" (e. g. introducing joint quality circles), "Contents of both Specialities" (e. g. necessity of communicating respective contents and competences), and "Patient-centred Care" (e. g. reintegration into workplace after longer periods of illness). The optimisation of cooperation was considered necessary by the OPs, whereas its necessity was sometimes questioned in the GPs' group. Conclusion In many aspects, the present data agree with results of studies from other countries addressing the cooperation between GPs and OPs and/or other specialists. Many suggestions obtained in this study are practical and could be implemented into daily routine. Future quantitative research is required to better assess the relative weight of the suggestions presented here.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 146
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], READER EINFUHRUNG QU
[2]  
Badura B, 2009, SCHWERPUNKTTHEMA BET
[3]   General practitioners and occupational health professionals - Consensus statement to improve interaction is timely and welcome [J].
Beach, J ;
Watt, D .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7410) :302-303
[4]   Job Satisfaction Among Primary Care Physicians Results of a Survey [J].
Behmann, Mareike ;
Schmiemann, Guido ;
Lingner, Heidrun ;
Kuehne, Franziska ;
Hummers-Pradier, Eva ;
Schneider, Nils .
DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (11) :193-200
[5]   Motives and preferences of general practitioners for new collaboration models with medical specialists: a qualitative study [J].
Berendsen, Annette J. ;
Benneker, Wim H. G. M. ;
Jong, Betty Meyboom-de ;
Klazinga, Niek S. ;
Schuling, Jan .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 7 (1)
[6]  
Bertelsmann-Stiftung, 2009, ABSCHL ARZT BETR ALS
[7]   Revealing the wood and the trees: reporting qualitative research [J].
Blignault, Ilse ;
Ritchie, Jan .
HEALTH PROMOTION JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2009, 20 (02) :140-145
[8]   Dutch occupational physicians and general practitioners wish to improve cooperation [J].
Buijs, P ;
van Amstel, R ;
van Dijk, F .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1999, 56 (10) :709-713
[9]  
Bungart J, 2005, PSYCHISCHE ERKRANKUN, V36, P47
[10]   Work, disability and rehabilitation: making the best job of it [J].
Chamberlain, M. Anne .
CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2007, 7 (06) :603-606