Impact of point spread function on infrared radiances from geostationary satellites

被引:21
作者
Zhang, Peng
Li, Jun
Olson, Erik
Schmit, Timothy J.
Li, Jinlong
Menzel, W. Paul
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Cooperat Inst Meteorol Satllite Studies, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Natl Ocean & Atmospher Adm, Off Res & Applicat, Natl Environm Satellite Data & Informat Serv, Madison, WI 53706 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2006年 / 44卷 / 08期
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
ensquared energy (EE); geostationary satellite (GEO); infrared (IR) radiances; point spread function (PSF);
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2006.872096
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The blurring from diffraction for the infrared (IR) radiances on a geostationary satellite (GEO) e.g., the next generation of Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES-R) was simulated by using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer Airborne Simulator data and the point spread function (PSF) model for an unobscured telescope. The portion of the total radiance contributed from each nearby geometrical field of view (GFOV) was calculated. For 90% ensquared energy (EE) (equivalent to 10% of the energy coming from outside the footprint), the closest GFOVs contribute 7%; the contribution from the closest GFOVs increases to 22% for 70% EE. The increased portion from the nearby GFOVs causes larger blurring and degrades the pixel-based retrieval product accuracy. Radiance contamination from the nearby field for the GEO IR radiances with 90%, 80%, and 70% EE causes 0.2-, 0.3-, and 0.4-K blurring errors, respectively, in the 12-mu m IR longwave window band in clear 300-K scenes. The blurring error is doubled in cloudy 230-K scenes. For the 13.8-mu m absorption band, the blurring error will be smaller than that of the 12-mu m band because the atmospheric layer where the temperature sensitivity peaks for the 13.8 mu m is more uniform than the surface where the 12 mu m is most sensitive. This indicates that the PSF has a greater impact on a heterogeneous surface. Similar blurring errors occur at both 4- and 10-km spatial resolution IR sensors. The blurring error is not random, and it varies spectrally. These conclusions are very relevant to the design of a cost-effective GEO IR sounder that meets the science requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:2176 / 2183
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Born M., 1980, Principles of optics: electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light
[2]  
*GOES, 2003, 417RHESPORD0020, P51
[3]  
Huang CQ, 2002, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V80, P203, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00068-8
[4]   ALIASING AND BLURRING IN 2-D SAMPLED IMAGERY [J].
HUCK, FO ;
HALYO, N ;
PARK, SK .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1980, 19 (13) :2174-2181
[5]  
King MD, 1996, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V13, P777, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0777:ASSFRS>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
MACDONALD ME, 2001, P IEEE AEROSP C, V4, P1693
[8]   THE LANDSAT SENSORS SPATIAL RESPONSES [J].
MARKHAM, BL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1985, 23 (06) :864-875
[9]  
Seemann SW, 2003, J APPL METEOROL, V42, P1072, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1072:OROATM>2.0.CO
[10]  
2