Team work engagement: A model of emergence

被引:124
作者
Costa, Patricia L. [1 ]
Passos, Ana M. [1 ]
Bakker, Arnold B. [2 ]
机构
[1] ISCTE IUL, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
emergent states; team dynamics; team work engagement; collective constructs; DEMANDS-RESOURCES MODEL; JOB DEMANDS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; COLLECTIVE EFFICACY; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; PREDICT BURNOUT; PERFORMANCE; ORGANIZATIONS; CONSTRUCTION; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1111/joop.12057
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Research has shown that work engagement, both at the individual and team levels, is relevant to understand employee performance and well-being. Nonetheless, there is no theoretical model that explains the development of work engagement in teams that takes into consideration what is already known about team dynamics and processes. This study addresses this gap in the literature, presenting a model for the emergence of team work engagement. The model proposes team inputs, outputs, and mediators as predictors of team work engagement and highlights their recursive influences over time. This conceptual work provides a starting point for further research on team work engagement, allowing for distinguishing individual and team constructs. Practitioner points The degree of energy and enthusiasm of teams depends on the way they interact. The affective and motivational dynamics of teams have consequences for their performance and well-being. The emergence of team work engagement is better understood within the literature of teamwork.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 436
页数:23
相关论文
共 99 条
[51]  
Kozlowski S. W. J., 2000, Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions, P3, DOI DOI 10.1177/001872679504800703
[52]   Advancing Multilevel Research Design: Capturing the Dynamics of Emergence [J].
Kozlowski, Steve W. J. ;
Chao, Georgia T. ;
Grand, James A. ;
Braun, Michael T. ;
Kuljanin, Goran .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2013, 16 (04) :581-615
[53]   The Dynamics of Emergence: Cognition and Cohesion in Work Teams [J].
Kozlowski, Steve W. J. ;
Chao, Georgia T. .
MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2012, 33 (5-6) :335-354
[54]   Individual differences in the relationship between pleasure and arousal [J].
Kuppens, Peter .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2008, 42 (04) :1053-1059
[55]   Burnout and work engagement: Do individual differences make a difference? [J].
Langelaan, S ;
Bakker, AB ;
van Doornen, LJP ;
Schaufeli, WB .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 40 (03) :521-532
[56]   FROM JOB-BASED TO COMPETENCE-BASED ORGANIZATIONS [J].
LAWLER, EE .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1994, 15 (01) :3-15
[57]  
Locke E.A., 1984, GOAL SETTING MOTIVAT
[58]   Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation - A 35-year odyssey [J].
Locke, EA ;
Latham, GP .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2002, 57 (09) :705-717
[59]   Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction [J].
Luthans, Fred ;
Avolio, Bruce J. ;
Avey, James B. ;
Norman, Steven M. .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 60 (03) :541-572
[60]   The role of weekly high-activated positive mood, context, and personality in innovative work behavior: A multilevel and interactional model [J].
Madrid, Hector P. ;
Patterson, Malcolm G. ;
Birdi, Kamal S. ;
Leiva, Pedro I. ;
Kausel, Edgar E. .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2014, 35 (02) :234-256