Environmental life cycle assessment of bio-fuel production via fast pyrolysis of corn stover and hydroprocessing

被引:66
作者
Dang, Qi [1 ]
Yu, Chunjiang [1 ]
Luo, Zhongyang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, State Key Lab Clean Energy Utilizat, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fast pyrolysis; Bio-oil upgrading; Non-renewable energy; GWP; LCA; BIO-OIL; FLASH PYROLYSIS; ETHANOL; DIESEL; HYDROGEN; GASOLINE; FUEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2014.04.029
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of biofuel production from corn stover fast pyrolysis and subsequent hydrotreating and hydrocracking was conducted based on the Greenhouse gases Regulated Emissions and Energy use in Transportation (GREET) model. Three different cases were investigated as a result of different hydrogen treatment in bio-oil upgrading process. Environmental impacts such as non-renewable energy demand and Global Warming Potential (GWP) were primarily evaluated for 1 MJ biofuel produced. All the results showed obvious environmental benefits compared with conventional gasoline and diesel based on the year of 2010. The results of Case 1 in which hydrogen was provided by external natural gas reforming displayed a reduction of 67.5% in net non-renewable energy demand and a reduction of 69.1% in net GWP in contrast to conventional gasoline and diesel. Net non-renewable energy demand was lowered by 76.6% and net GWP was reduced by 73.0% in Case 2 where 35% of bio-oil aqueous phase was consumed by steam reforming for hydrogen production. Case 3 gained an obvious advantage on both environmental aspects over the others, in which surplus hydrogen from steam reforming of whole aqueous phase of bio-oil was obtained as a coproduct. The results displayed a significant net non-renewable energy reduction of 147.5% and a net GWP reduction of 119.4%. However, the outcomes indicated decreasing biofuel yields from Case 1 to Case 3 compared with increasing environmental benefits. The biofuel yields of three cases were 31.2%, 23.7% and 11.5% respectively in this work. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 42
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Alckmin G., 2004, Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Production and Use of Fuel Ethanol in Brazil
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation Model (GREET) Model
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANLESD118
[4]   Life cycle assessment of switchgrass-derived ethanol as transport fuel [J].
Bai, Yu ;
Luo, Lin ;
van der Voet, Ester .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (05) :468-477
[5]   Biofuels from microalgae-A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products [J].
Brennan, Liam ;
Owende, Philip .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (02) :557-577
[6]   Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading [J].
Bridgwater, A. V. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 38 :68-94
[7]   A review of recent laboratory research and commercial developments in fast pyrolysis and upgrading [J].
Butler, Eoin ;
Devlin, Ger ;
Meier, Dietrich ;
McDonnell, Kevin .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (08) :4171-4186
[8]   Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: State of the art and future challenges [J].
Cherubini, Francesco ;
Stromman, Anders Hammer .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (02) :437-451
[9]   Biorefineries for biofuel upgrading: A critical review [J].
Demirbas, M. Fatih .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2009, 86 :S151-S161
[10]   Life cycle assessment of electricity generation using fast pyrolysis bio-oil [J].
Fan, Jiqing ;
Kalnes, Tom N. ;
Alward, Matthew ;
Klinger, Jordan ;
Sadehvandi, Adam ;
Shonnard, David R. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (02) :632-641