Pharmacokinetics and effects of propofol 6% for short-term sedation in paediatric patients following cardiac surgery

被引:28
作者
Knibbe, CAJ
Melenhorst-de Jong, G
Mestrom, M
Rademaker, CMA
Reijnvaan, AFA
Zuideveld, KP
Kuks, PFM
van Vught, H
Danhof, M
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, NL-3430 EM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Paediat, Div Pharm, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Paediat, Dept Cardiac Anaesthesiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Leiden Amsterdam Ctr Drug Res, Div Pharmacol, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Paediat, Paediat Intens Care Unit, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
anaesthetics i. v; children; paediatrics; pharmacokinetics; PICU; propofol; sedation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01652.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aims This paper describes the pharmacokinetics and effects of propofol in short-term sedated paediatric patients. Methods Six mechanically ventilated children aged 1-5 years received a 6 h continuous infusion of propofol 6% at the rate of 2 or 3 mg kg(-1) h(-1) for sedation following cardiac surgery. A total of seven arterial blood samples was collected at various time points during and after the infusion in each patient. Pharmacokinetic modelling was performed using NONMEM. Effects were assessed on the basis of the Ramsay sedation score as well as a subjective sedation scale. Results The data were best described by a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. In the model, body weight was a significant covariate for clearance. Pharmacokinetic parameters in the weight-proportional model were clearance (CL) = 35 ml kg(-1) min(-1), volume of central compartment (V-1) = 12 l, intercompartmental clearance (Q) = 0.35 l min(-1) and volume of peripheral compartment (V-2) = 24 l. The interindividual variabilities for these parameters were 8%, < 1%, 11% and 35%, respectively. Compared with the population pharmacokinetics in adults following cardiac surgery and when normalized for body weight, statistically significant differences were observed for the parameters CL and V1 (35 vs 29 ml kg(-1) min(-1) and 0.78 vs 0.26 l kg(-1) P < 0.05), whereas the values for Q and V-2 were similar (23 vs 18 ml kg(-1) min 1 and 1.6 vs 1.8 l kg(-1), P > 0.05). In children, the percentage of adequately sedated patients was similar compared with adults (50% vs 67%) despite considerably higher propofol concentrations (1.3 +/- 0.10 vs 0.51 +/- 0.035 mg l(-1), mean +/- s.e. mean), suggesting a lower pharmacodynamic sensitivity to propofol in children. Conclusions In children aged 1-5 years, a pharmacokinetic model for propofol was described using sparse data. In contrast to adults, body weight was a significant covariate for clearance in children. The model may serve as a useful basis to study the role of covariates in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in paediatric patients of different ages.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 422
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Size, myths and the clinical pharmacokinetics of analgesia in paediatric patients [J].
Anderson, BJ ;
McKee, AD ;
Holford, NHG .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1997, 33 (05) :313-327
[2]  
Boeckmann AJ, 1998, NONMEM USERS GUIDE
[3]  
Bray RJ, 1998, PAEDIATR ANAESTH, V8, P491
[4]   PROPOFOL - AN UPDATE OF ITS USE IN ANESTHESIA AND CONSCIOUS SEDATION [J].
BRYSON, HM ;
FULTON, BR ;
FAULDS, D .
DRUGS, 1995, 50 (03) :513-559
[5]   Influence of different fat emulsion-based intravenous formulations on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol [J].
Cox, EH ;
Knibbe, CAJ ;
Koster, VS ;
Langemeijer, MWE ;
Tukker, EE ;
Lange, R ;
Kuks, PFM ;
Langemeijer, HJM ;
Lie-A-Huen, L ;
Danhof, M .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1998, 15 (03) :442-448
[6]   Propofol-infusion syndrome in children [J].
Hatch, DJ .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9159) :1117-1118
[7]   A size standard for pharmacokinetics [J].
Holford, NHG .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1996, 30 (05) :329-332
[8]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF PROPOFOL IN CHILDREN [J].
JONES, RDM ;
CHAN, K ;
ANDREW, LJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 65 (05) :661-667
[9]   THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF PROPOFOL IN CHILDREN USING 3 DIFFERENT DATA-ANALYSIS APPROACHES [J].
KATARIA, BK ;
VED, SA ;
NICODEMUS, HF ;
HOY, GR ;
LEA, D ;
DUBOIS, MY ;
MANDEMA, JW ;
SHAFER, SL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 80 (01) :104-122
[10]   Pharmacokinetics, induction of anaesthesia and safety characteristics of propofol 6% SAZN vs propofol 1% SAZN and Diprivan®-10 after bolus injection [J].
Knibbe, CAJ ;
Voortman, HJ ;
Aarts, LPHJ ;
Kuks, PFM ;
Lange, R ;
Langemeijer, HJM ;
Danhof, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 47 (06) :653-660