The contribution of constructed green infrastructure to urban biodiversity: A synthesis and meta-analysis

被引:130
作者
Filazzola, Alessandro [1 ]
Shrestha, Namrata [2 ]
MacIvor, J. Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Biol Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Toronto & Reg Conservat Author, Concord, ON, Canada
关键词
ecosystem services; green roof; retention pond; stormwater management; urban ecology; wildlife conservation; ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES; THERMAL PERFORMANCE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; AMPHIBIAN USE; HABITAT; ECOLOGY; ROOFS; BIRD; DIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.13475
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The development of buildings and other infrastructure in cities is viewed as a threat to local biodiversity and ecosystem functioning because natural habitat is replaced. However, there is momentum for implementing green infrastructure (GI), such as green roofs, wetland detention basins and community gardens, that partially offset these impacts and that benefit human health. GI is often designed to explicitly support ecosystem services, including implied benefits to biodiversity. The effects of GI on biodiversity have been rarely quantified, but research on this topic has increased exponentially in the last decade and a synthesis of the literature is needed. Here, we examined 1,883 published manuscripts and conducted a meta-analysis on 33 studies that were relevant. We determined whether GI provides additional benefits to biodiversity over conventional infrastructure or natural counterparts. We also highlighted research gaps and identified opportunities to improve future applications. We determined that GI significantly improves biodiversity over conventional infrastructure equivalents, and that in some cases GI had comparable measures of biodiversity to natural counterparts. Many studies were omitted from these analyses because we found GI research has generally neglected conventional experimental design frameworks, including controls, replication or adequate sampling effort. Synthesis and applications. Our synthesis identified that taxa specificity is an important consideration for green infrastructure (GI) design relative to the more common measurements at the community level. We also identified that ignoring multi-trophic interactions and landscape-level patterns can limit our understanding of GI effects on biodiversity. We recommend further examination of species-specific differences among infrastructures (i.e. green, conventional or natural equivalents) or using functional traits to improve the efficacy of GI implementation on urban biodiversity. Furthermore, we encourage policy makers and practitioners to improve the design of GI to benefit urban ecosystems because of the potential benefits for both humans and global biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:2131 / 2143
页数:13
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [1] Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
  • [2] Roads may act as barriers to flying insects: species composition of bees and wasps differs on two sides of a large highway
    Andersson, Petter
    Koffman, Anna
    Sjodin, N. Erik
    Johansson, Victor
    [J]. NATURE CONSERVATION-BULGARIA, 2017, (18): : 47 - 59
  • [3] Green infrastructure development at European Union's eastern border: Effects of road infrastructure and forest habitat loss
    Angelstam, Per
    Khaulyak, Olha
    Yamelynets, Taras
    Mozgeris, Gintautas
    Naumov, Vladimir
    Chmielewski, Tadeusz J.
    Elbakidze, Marine
    Manton, Michael
    Prots, Bohdan
    Valasiuk, Sviataslau
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 193 : 300 - 311
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, OIKOS, DOI DOI 10.5751/ACE-00568-080206
  • [5] Roadsides: an opportunity for biodiversity conservation
    Arenas, Juan M.
    Escudero, Adrian
    Mola, Ignacio
    Casado, Miguel A.
    [J]. APPLIED VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2017, 20 (04) : 527 - 537
  • [6] Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management
    Aronson, Myla F. J.
    Lepczyk, Christopher A.
    Evans, Karl L.
    Goddard, Mark A.
    Lerman, Susannah B.
    MacIvor, J. Scott
    Nilon, Charles H.
    Vargo, Timothy
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 15 (04) : 189 - 196
  • [7] A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers
    Aronson, Myla F. J.
    La Sorte, Frank A.
    Nilon, Charles H.
    Katti, Madhusudan
    Goddard, Mark A.
    Lepczyk, Christopher A.
    Warren, Paige S.
    Williams, Nicholas S. G.
    Cilliers, Sarel
    Clarkson, Bruce
    Dobbs, Cynnamon
    Dolan, Rebecca
    Hedblom, Marcus
    Klotz, Stefan
    Kooijmans, Jip Louwe
    Kuehn, Ingolf
    MacGregor-Fors, Ian
    McDonnell, Mark
    Mortberg, Ulla
    Pysek, Petr
    Siebert, Stefan
    Sushinsky, Jessica
    Werner, Peter
    Winter, Marten
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 281 (1780)
  • [8] Baumann Nathalie, 2010, P348, DOI 10.1002/9781444318654.ch18
  • [9] Bird use of stormwater-management ponds: Decreasing avian attractants on airports
    Blackwell, Bradley F.
    Schafer, Laurence M.
    Helon, David A.
    Linnell, Michael A.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2008, 86 (02) : 162 - 170
  • [10] Fearing the feline: domestic cats reduce avian fecundity through trait-mediated indirect effects that increase nest predation by other species
    Bonnington, Colin
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    Evans, Karl L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2013, 50 (01) : 15 - 24