The contribution of constructed green infrastructure to urban biodiversity: A synthesis and meta-analysis

被引:140
作者
Filazzola, Alessandro [1 ]
Shrestha, Namrata [2 ]
MacIvor, J. Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Biol Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Toronto & Reg Conservat Author, Concord, ON, Canada
关键词
ecosystem services; green roof; retention pond; stormwater management; urban ecology; wildlife conservation; ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES; THERMAL PERFORMANCE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; AMPHIBIAN USE; HABITAT; ECOLOGY; ROOFS; BIRD; DIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.13475
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The development of buildings and other infrastructure in cities is viewed as a threat to local biodiversity and ecosystem functioning because natural habitat is replaced. However, there is momentum for implementing green infrastructure (GI), such as green roofs, wetland detention basins and community gardens, that partially offset these impacts and that benefit human health. GI is often designed to explicitly support ecosystem services, including implied benefits to biodiversity. The effects of GI on biodiversity have been rarely quantified, but research on this topic has increased exponentially in the last decade and a synthesis of the literature is needed. Here, we examined 1,883 published manuscripts and conducted a meta-analysis on 33 studies that were relevant. We determined whether GI provides additional benefits to biodiversity over conventional infrastructure or natural counterparts. We also highlighted research gaps and identified opportunities to improve future applications. We determined that GI significantly improves biodiversity over conventional infrastructure equivalents, and that in some cases GI had comparable measures of biodiversity to natural counterparts. Many studies were omitted from these analyses because we found GI research has generally neglected conventional experimental design frameworks, including controls, replication or adequate sampling effort. Synthesis and applications. Our synthesis identified that taxa specificity is an important consideration for green infrastructure (GI) design relative to the more common measurements at the community level. We also identified that ignoring multi-trophic interactions and landscape-level patterns can limit our understanding of GI effects on biodiversity. We recommend further examination of species-specific differences among infrastructures (i.e. green, conventional or natural equivalents) or using functional traits to improve the efficacy of GI implementation on urban biodiversity. Furthermore, we encourage policy makers and practitioners to improve the design of GI to benefit urban ecosystems because of the potential benefits for both humans and global biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:2131 / 2143
页数:13
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[2]   Roads may act as barriers to flying insects: species composition of bees and wasps differs on two sides of a large highway [J].
Andersson, Petter ;
Koffman, Anna ;
Sjodin, N. Erik ;
Johansson, Victor .
NATURE CONSERVATION-BULGARIA, 2017, (18) :47-59
[3]   Green infrastructure development at European Union's eastern border: Effects of road infrastructure and forest habitat loss [J].
Angelstam, Per ;
Khaulyak, Olha ;
Yamelynets, Taras ;
Mozgeris, Gintautas ;
Naumov, Vladimir ;
Chmielewski, Tadeusz J. ;
Elbakidze, Marine ;
Manton, Michael ;
Prots, Bohdan ;
Valasiuk, Sviataslau .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 193 :300-311
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, OIKOS, DOI DOI 10.5751/ACE-00568-080206
[5]   Roadsides: an opportunity for biodiversity conservation [J].
Arenas, Juan M. ;
Escudero, Adrian ;
Mola, Ignacio ;
Casado, Miguel A. .
APPLIED VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2017, 20 (04) :527-537
[6]   Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management [J].
Aronson, Myla F. J. ;
Lepczyk, Christopher A. ;
Evans, Karl L. ;
Goddard, Mark A. ;
Lerman, Susannah B. ;
MacIvor, J. Scott ;
Nilon, Charles H. ;
Vargo, Timothy .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 15 (04) :189-196
[7]   A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers [J].
Aronson, Myla F. J. ;
La Sorte, Frank A. ;
Nilon, Charles H. ;
Katti, Madhusudan ;
Goddard, Mark A. ;
Lepczyk, Christopher A. ;
Warren, Paige S. ;
Williams, Nicholas S. G. ;
Cilliers, Sarel ;
Clarkson, Bruce ;
Dobbs, Cynnamon ;
Dolan, Rebecca ;
Hedblom, Marcus ;
Klotz, Stefan ;
Kooijmans, Jip Louwe ;
Kuehn, Ingolf ;
MacGregor-Fors, Ian ;
McDonnell, Mark ;
Mortberg, Ulla ;
Pysek, Petr ;
Siebert, Stefan ;
Sushinsky, Jessica ;
Werner, Peter ;
Winter, Marten .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 281 (1780)
[8]  
Baumann Nathalie, 2010, P348, DOI 10.1002/9781444318654.ch18
[9]   Bird use of stormwater-management ponds: Decreasing avian attractants on airports [J].
Blackwell, Bradley F. ;
Schafer, Laurence M. ;
Helon, David A. ;
Linnell, Michael A. .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2008, 86 (02) :162-170
[10]   Fearing the feline: domestic cats reduce avian fecundity through trait-mediated indirect effects that increase nest predation by other species [J].
Bonnington, Colin ;
Gaston, Kevin J. ;
Evans, Karl L. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2013, 50 (01) :15-24