Federalism, water, and (de)centralization in Brazil: the case of the So Francisco River water diversion

被引:11
作者
Empinotti, Vanessa Lucena [1 ]
Gontijo, Wilde Cardoso, Jr. [2 ]
de Oliveira, Vanessa Elias [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ ABC, Arcturus St 03, BR-09606070 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Natl Water Agcy ANA, Setor Policial Sul, Area 5,Quadra 3,Bloco M, BR-70610200 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
Water governance; Sao Francisco River; Water diversion; Brazil; Federalism; Decentralization; POLITICS; CONSTRUCTION; GOVERNANCE; SCALE; CEARA; FLOW;
D O I
10.1007/s10113-018-1371-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Brazilian Northeastern semi-arid region's history has been characterized by drought, water scarcity, and poor living conditions. For the last 100 years, institutions have been established to support the state sector's different attempts to solve the water scarcity and poverty problems in the region. In the Brazilian federalist model that combines centralized decision power with a decentralized execution of public policies, the federal government promotes large-scale infrastructure interventions, such as the So Francisco River Water Diversion Project (SFRWDP). This article aims to show how intergovernmental relations, under the Brazilian federal system, enable centralized decision-making processes. We will analyze the roles of subnational and national entities and the factors influencing their interaction. Even though decentralized participatory water institutions are in place, the federal government controlled and centralized the process of approval of the SFRWDP as well as its implementation and management. While federal agencies dispute control over decision-making processes and financial resources, the states lack financial and institutional capacity to use the power that is attributed to them by the Water Law. The persistence of a federal system that perpetuates the federal government's central role and the interstates' power inequalities, may continue to wreck any attempt to promote decentralization and subnational and interstate collaboration in the Brazilian context.
引用
收藏
页码:1655 / 1666
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework
    Agarwal, B
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) : 1623 - 1648
  • [2] Almeida Maria Hermínia Tavares de, 2005, Rev. Sociol. Polit., P29
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, Conjuntura dos Recursos Hidricos no Brasil: 2013
  • [4] [Anonymous], INSTITUI SISTEMA GES
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1996, Revista de Sociologia Politica, DOI DOI 10.1590/S0104-44782005000100008
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, TRANSPOSITION S O FR
  • [7] [Anonymous], PLAN DEC REC HIDR BA
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1997, GOOD GOVT TROPICS
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2010, CENSO DEMOGRAFICO 20
  • [10] [Anonymous], PLAN DEC REC HIDR BA