Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: a prospective study using low-dose propofol, meperldine/fentanyl, and midazolam

被引:177
|
作者
Cohen, LB [1 ]
Hightower, CD [1 ]
Wood, DA [1 ]
Miller, KM [1 ]
Aisenberg, J [1 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Med Gastroenterol, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(04)00349-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Propofol provides several benefits over benzodiazepine and narcotic agents as a sedative medication for endoscopic procedures, including faster recovery and improved patient satisfaction. However, its use generally has been limited to anesthesiologists because of the risks associated with deep sedation. Methods: One hundred patients undergoing colonoscopy or EGD were sedated with low-dose propofol, midazolam, and fentanyl (or meperidine). Depth of sedation was assessed at 2-minute intervals by an independent observer by using the American Society of Anesthesiologists criteria. Recovery time was determined by using paired neuropsychometric tests. A post-procedure satisfaction survey and 24-hour follow-up questionnaires were administered. Results: For colonoscopy and EGD, respectively, the mean propofol dose was 98 mg and 79 mg, the mean midazolam dose was 0.9 mg and 0.8 mg, the mean fentanyl dose was 69 mcg and 63 mcg, and the mean meperidine dose was 42 mg (for both procedures). There were 628 assessments of the level of sedation performed during 74 colonoscopies and 101 assessments during 26 EGDs. The level of sedation was minimal in 77%, moderate in 21%, and deep in 2% of assessments. Nine of the 13 episodes of deep sedation were recorded during colonoscopy and 4 during EGD. In no instance was more than a single assessment of deep sedation recorded during one procedure. Ninety-eight percent of patients were satisfied with the sedation, and 71% returned to their usual activities within 2 hours of discharge. There was no serious adverse event. Conclusions: Endoscopic sedation with low-dose propofol, a narcotic agent, and midazolam produces a moderate level of sedation. The quality of sedation and measures of recovery are comparable with the results reported with standard-dose propofol.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 803
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Addition of low-dose ketamine to midazolam-fentanyl-propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Tuncali, Bahattin
    Pekcan, Yonca Ozvardar
    Celebi, Arzu
    Zeyneloglu, Pinar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2015, 27 (04) : 301 - 306
  • [22] Conscious sedation using propofol versus midazolam in cirrhotic patients during upper GI endoscopy: A comparative study
    Wahab, Essam A.
    Hamed, Emad F.
    Ahmad, Hanan S.
    Monem, Sameh M. Abdel
    Fathy, Talaat
    JGH OPEN, 2019, 3 (01): : 25 - 31
  • [23] Unconscious sedation/analgesia with propofol versus conscious sedation with fentanyl/midazolam for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation:a prospective,randomized study
    TANG Ri-bo DONG Jian-zeng ZHAO Wen-du LIU Xing-peng KANG Jun-ping LONG De-yong YU Rong-hui HU Fu-li LIU Xiao-hui MA Chang-sheng Department of Cardiology Department of Anesthesiology Beijing Anzhen Hospital
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2007, (22) : 2036 - 2038
  • [24] THE SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF LOW-DOSE PROPOFOL - A DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY TO EVALUATE DIMENSIONS OF SEDATION AND CONSCIOUSNESS WITH LOW-DOSE PROPOFOL
    WHITEHEAD, C
    SANDERS, LD
    OLDROYD, G
    HAYNES, TK
    MARSHALL, RW
    ROSEN, M
    ROBINSON, JO
    ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 49 (06) : 490 - 496
  • [25] Unconscious sedation/analgesia with propofol versus conscious sedation with fentanyl/midazolam for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a prospective, randomized study
    Tang Ri-bo
    Dong Jian-zeng
    Zhao Wen-du
    Liu Xing-peng
    Kang Jun-ping
    Long De-yong
    Yu Rong-hui
    Hu Fu-li
    Liu Xiao-hui
    Ma Chang-sheng
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 120 (22) : 2036 - 2038
  • [26] Unconscious sedation/analgesia with propofol versus conscious sedation with fentanyl/midazolam for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation:a prospective,randomized study
    TANG Ribo DONG Jianzeng ZHAO Wendu LIU Xingpeng KANG Junping LONG Deyong YU Ronghui HU Fuli LIU Xiaohui MA Changsheng Department of Cardiology Department of Anesthesiology Beijing Anzhen HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijing China
    Chinese Medical Journal, 2007, 120 (22) : 2036 - 2038
  • [27] Usefulness of Continuous Low-Dose Fentanyl in Combination with Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for Intravenous Sedation: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Okumura, Yoko
    Sato , Aiji
    Tachi, Naoko
    Kanazawa, Mayuko
    Kawabata, Miko
    Okuda, Masahiro
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 2022
  • [28] Safety And Discomfort During Bronchoscopy Performed Under Sedation With Fentanyl And Midazolam: A Prospective Study
    Minami, D.
    Takigawa, N.
    Ninomiya, T.
    Kubo, T.
    Ichihara, E.
    Ohashi, K.
    Sato, A.
    Hotta, K.
    Shibayama, T.
    Miyahara, N.
    Tabata, M.
    Kanehiro, A.
    Kiura, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 195
  • [29] Safety and discomfort during bronchoscopy performed under sedation with fentanyl and midazolam: a prospective study
    Minami, Daisuke
    Takigawa, Nagio
    Watanabe, Hiromi
    Ninomiya, Takashi
    Kubo, Toshio
    Ohashi, Kadoaki
    Sato, Akiko
    Hotta, Katsuyuki
    Tabata, Masahiro
    Tanimoto, Mitsune
    Kiura, Katsuyuki
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 46 (09) : 871 - 874
  • [30] Propofol versus midazolam for conscious sedation during ERCP: A randomized prospective study.
    Jung, M
    Hofmann, C
    Brackertz, A
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 114 (04) : A21 - A21