Durability and testing of mortar with interground fly ash and limestone cements in sulfate solutions

被引:27
作者
Sirisawat, Ittiporn [1 ]
Saengsoy, Warangkana [2 ]
Baingam, Lalita [1 ]
Krammart, Pitisan [3 ]
Tangtermsirikul, Somnuk [1 ]
机构
[1] Thammasat Univ, Sirindhorn Int Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Technol, Pathum Thani, Thailand
[2] Thammasat Univ, Sirindhorn Int Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Technol, Construct & Maintenance Technol Res Ctr CONTEC, Pathum Thani, Thailand
[3] Rajamangala Univ Technol Thanyaburi, Dept Civil Engn, Pathum Thani, Thailand
关键词
Sulfate resistance; Magnesium sulfate; Expansion; Weight loss; Strength reduction; Surface area loss; Image processing technique; Interground cement; MAGNESIUM-SULFATE; AMBIENT-TEMPERATURE; ATTACK; ENVIRONMENTS; RESISTANCE; PASTES;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.083
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study was aimed to indicate the inadequacies of the presently used methods for testing sulfate resistance of cementitious systems, especially when tested in magnesium sulfate solution, and propose proper laboratory tests for evaluating the sulfate resistance of mortars with various types of binders. The test methods involved immersion of mortar specimens in 33,800 ppm sodium sulfate and magnesium sulfate solutions. The resistance of mortars with different binders to sulfate attack was evaluated by applying several test methods. Results of an investigation on sulfate resistance of ordinary Portland cement and interground cement mortars, which were tested by the test methods of expansion, weight loss, strength reduction, and surface area loss with an image processing technique (SLIP technique), are presented. It was observed that for sodium sulfate solution, an expansion test is appropriate for performance evaluation of all tested ordinary Portland cement and blended cement mortars. In the case of an magnesium sulfate solution, weight loss or surface area loss with an image processing technique is considered suitable to test interground fly ash cement mortars while the expansion test is not. However, for OPC and interground limestone cement mortars immersed in an magnesium sulfate solution, the suitable tests are both expansion and weight loss or surface area loss with an image processing technique (SLIP technique). (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 46
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Sulfate attack and reinforcement corrosion in plain and blended cements exposed to sulfate environments [J].
Al-Amoudi, OSB .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 33 (01) :53-61
[2]   PERFORMANCE OF 15 REINFORCED-CONCRETE MIXTURES IN MAGNESIUM-SODIUM SULFATE ENVIRONMENTS [J].
ALAMOUDI, OSB .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 1995, 9 (03) :149-158
[3]  
ALAMOUDI OSB, 1995, ACI MATER J, V92, P15
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 15P12004 TIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 2012R ACI COMM
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, C1012 ASTM
[7]   Resistance of plain and blended cement mortars exposed to severe sulfate attacks [J].
Aye, Thidar ;
Oguchi, Chiaki T. .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2011, 25 (06) :2988-2996
[8]  
Baingam L., 2012, PUR APPL CHEM INT C
[9]   Resistance to magnesium sulfate and sodium sulfate attack of mortars containing wheat straw ash [J].
Biricik, H ;
Aköz, F ;
Türker, F ;
Berktay, I .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2000, 30 (08) :1189-1197
[10]   MAGNESIUM-SULFATE ATTACK ON PORTLAND-CEMENT PASTE .1. MICROSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS [J].
BONEN, D ;
COHEN, MD .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 1992, 22 (01) :169-180