Behavioral functions of stimuli signaling transitions across rich and lean schedules of reinforcement

被引:17
作者
Everly, Jessica B. [1 ]
Holtyn, August F. [2 ]
Perone, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh Greensburg, Greensburg, PA 15601 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[3] W Virginia Univ, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
conditioned punisher; observing; key peck; stimulus control; postreinforcement pause; incentive shift; pigeons; FIXED-RATIO SCHEDULES; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; MAGNITUDE; PUNISHMENT; DETERMINANTS; CONTRAST; ESCAPE;
D O I
10.1002/jeab.74
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
On multiple fixed-ratio schedules, pausing is extended at the start of a component ending in a small reinforcer (a lean component) but only when this component follows a component ending in a large reinforcer (a rich component). In two experiments, we assessed whether a stimulus correlated with a lean component is aversive and how its function is affected by the preceding component. In Experiment 1, pigeons responded on mixed fixed-ratio schedules ending in large or small reinforcers. Observing responses converted the mixed schedule to a multiple one by producing a stimulus correlated with the current component. Overall, the lean stimulus did not suppress observing, suggesting that it was not sufficiently aversive. In Experiment 2, an escape procedure was used, and pigeons could convert a multiple schedule to a mixed one by pecking a key to remove the discriminative stimuli. Pigeons escaped from the lean-schedule stimulus more than they did from the rich one. For two pigeons, this effect was enhanced when a rich component preceded the lean stimulus. The results indicate that a stimulus correlated with the leaner of two reinforcement schedules can acquire aversive functions, but observing and escape procedures may differ in their abilities to detect this effect.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 214
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
[3]   MOTIVATIONAL ASPECTS OF ESCAPE FROM PUNISHMENT [J].
AZRIN, NH ;
HAKE, DF ;
HOLZ, WC ;
HUTCHINSON, RR .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1965, 8 (01) :31-44
[4]   TIME-OUT FROM POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT [J].
AZRIN, NH .
SCIENCE, 1961, 133 (345) :382-&
[5]   REINFORCEMENT MAGNITUDE AND PAUSING ON PROGRESSIVE-RATIO SCHEDULES [J].
BARON, A ;
MIKORSKI, J ;
SCHLUND, M .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1992, 58 (02) :377-388
[6]   DISTRIBUTION OF OBSERVING RESPONSES DURING 2 VI SCHEDULES [J].
BRANCH, MN .
PSYCHONOMIC SCIENCE, 1970, 20 (01) :5-6
[7]   SCHEDULE-INDUCED ESCAPE FROM FIXED-INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT [J].
BROWN, TG ;
FLORY, RK .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1972, 17 (03) :395-&
[8]   THE DELAY-REDUCTION HYPOTHESIS OF CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT AND PUNISHMENT - OBSERVING BEHAVIOR [J].
CASE, DA ;
FANTINO, E .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1981, 35 (01) :93-108
[9]   RESPONSE SUPPRESSION AS A FUNCTION OF INTENSITY AND DURATION OF A PUNISHMENT [J].
CHURCH, RM ;
RAYMOND, GA ;
BEAUCHAMP, RD .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1967, 63 (01) :39-+
[10]   THE NATURE AND DETERMINANTS OF SPATIAL RETREAT IN THE PIGEON BETWEEN PERIODIC GRAIN PRESENTATIONS [J].
COHEN, PS ;
CAMPAGNONI, FR .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1989, 17 (01) :39-48