Minimally Invasive Sinus Lift Implant Device: A Multicenter Safety and Efficacy Trial Preliminary Results

被引:22
作者
Better, Hadar [1 ,2 ]
Slavescu, Dragos [3 ]
Barbu, Horia [4 ]
Cochran, David L. [5 ]
Chaushu, Gabi [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Private Clin, Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Maxillent Ltd, Herzliyya, Israel
[3] Clin Emergency Bucharest Hosp, Bucharest, Romania
[4] Titu Maiorescu Univ, Dept Oral Surg & Implant Dent, Fac Dent, Bucharest, Romania
[5] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Periodont, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[6] Rabin Med Ctr, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[7] Tel Aviv Univ, Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
bone grafting; crestal; implant; minimally invasive; sinus lift procedure; FLOOR ELEVATION; MAXILLARY; COMPLICATIONS; AUGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12021
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: In cases of advanced maxillary sinus atrophy of the bone (pneumatization), the sinus floor has to be augmented in order to obtain acceptable bone volume for implantation. The objective of the present study is to evaluate a new procedure and device, designed as a closed sinus lift using a dedicated dental implant that allows for Schneiderian membrane elevation and the placement of a flowable bone replacement graft. Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients (8 males, 10 females) underwent 23 procedures. All procedures were completed successfully, with elevation of the sinus membrane and insertion of bone graft and the dental implant at the planned site. No membrane tears were noted. No intraoperative or postoperative adverse events were observed in any of the cases. There were no postprocedural emergency or distress calls. Results: The patients' average age was 52 (range 38-72). The mean residual alveolar ridge height was 5.5 mm (range 4.0-7.0). The average bone gain was 11.2 mm (range 9-13) after an average healing period of 8.7 months (range 6.7-13.1). All implants achieved clinical stability and prosthetic rehabilitation was uneventful. Conclusions: A closed sinus floor elevation procedure can be accomplished using a dedicated dental implant that allows for hydraulic elevation of the Schneiderian membrane and placement of a flowable bone replacement graft and dental implant placement all at the same time with minimal patient discomfort.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 526
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, COMPENDIUM
[2]   An 8-year retrospective study: 1,100 patients receiving 1,557 implants using the minimally invasive hydraulic sinus condensing technique [J].
Chen, L ;
Cha, J .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 76 (03) :482-491
[3]   Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Emmerich, D ;
Att, W ;
Stappert, C .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 76 (08) :1237-1251
[4]  
Garg A K, 1999, Implant Dent, V8, P36, DOI 10.1097/00008505-199901000-00004
[5]  
Jensen O.T., 2006, The sinus bone graft, V2nd
[6]   Sinus augmentation complications: Etiology and treatment [J].
Katranji, Amar ;
Fotek, Paul ;
Wang, Hom-Lay .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2008, 17 (03) :339-346
[7]  
Levin L, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P369
[8]   The Patient's Perception of Recovery After Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Prospective Study [J].
Mardinger, Ofer ;
Poliakov, Helena ;
Beitlitum, Ilan ;
Nissan, Joseph ;
Chaushu, Gavriel .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2009, 80 (04) :572-576
[9]  
Pommer B, 2009, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V24, P817
[10]   Mechanical properties of the Schneiderian membrane in vitro [J].
Pommer, Bernhard ;
Unger, Ewald ;
Suetoe, Daniel ;
Hack, Niklas ;
Watzek, Georg .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (06) :633-637