A review on eco-city evaluation methods and highlights for integration

被引:73
作者
Dong, Huijuan [1 ]
Fujita, Tsuyoshi [1 ]
Geng, Yong [2 ]
Dong, Liang [1 ]
Ohnishi, Satoshi [1 ]
Sun, Lu [1 ]
Dou, Yi [1 ]
Fujii, Minoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
Eco-city; Evaluation methods; Review; Sustainability; Integration; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; WATER FOOTPRINT; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS; EMISSION REDUCTION; WASTE MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.044
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Current rapid urban development, particularly in Asian cities, is facing various challenges, such as resource depletion, environmental emissions and increasing pressures on responding climate change. It is critical for decision-makers to raise the appropriate urban development strategies so that cities can move toward sustainable development. In this regard, well-designed evaluation methods are valuable for managing environmental development and providing guidelines to improve sustainable urban development. Six well-known assessment methods for environment and sustainability assessment, namely, input-output analysis (IOA), life-cycle analysis (LCA), ecological footprint (EF), carbon footprint (CF), emergy analysis and cost benefit analysis are selected. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review on these methods and proposes an integration of different methods so that the holistic performance of one eco-city initiative can be scientifically evaluated and key problems can be identified. Such an integration can solve the problems that each single method is facing so that valuable policy insights can be identified for urban decision-makers to prepare more appropriate urban strategies. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1184 / 1191
页数:8
相关论文
共 100 条
[91]   An input-output approach to evaluate the water footprint and virtual water trade of Beijing, China [J].
Wang, Ziyuan ;
Huang, Kai ;
Yang, Shunshun ;
Yu, Yajuan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 42 :172-179
[92]  
Wiedmann T., 2010, Sustainability, V2, P1645, DOI [10.3390/su2061645, DOI 10.3390/SU2061645]
[93]   Contributing to local policy making on GHG emission reduction through inventorying and attribution: A case study of Shenyang, China [J].
Xi, Fengming ;
Geng, Yong ;
Chen, Xudong ;
Zhang, Yunsong ;
Wang, Xinbei ;
Xue, Bing ;
Dong, Huijuan ;
Liu, Zhu ;
Ren, Wanxia ;
Fujita, Tsuyoshi ;
Zhu, Qinghua .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (10) :5999-6010
[94]   Developing a Science of Infrastructure Ecology for Sustainable Urban Systems [J].
Xu, Ming ;
Weissburg, Marc ;
Newell, Joshua P. ;
Crittenden, John C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (15) :7928-7929
[95]   Calculation of embodied energy in Sino-USA trade: 1997-2011 [J].
Yang, Ranran ;
Long, Ruyin ;
Yue, Ting ;
Shi, Haihong .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 72 :110-119
[96]   Understanding the Evolution of Industrial Symbiosis Research A Bibliometric and Network Analysis (1997-2012) [J].
Yu, Chang ;
Davis, Chris ;
Dijkema, Gerard P. J. .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 18 (02) :280-293
[97]   Low carbon eco-city: New approach for Chinese urbanisation [J].
Yu, Li .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 44 :102-110
[98]   Emergy analysis of the urban metabolism of Beijing [J].
Zhang, Yan ;
Yang, Zhifeng ;
Liu, Gengyuan ;
Yu, Xiangyi .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (14) :2377-2384
[99]   Analyses of water footprint of Beijing in an interregional input-output framework [J].
Zhang, Zhuoying ;
Yang, Hong ;
Shi, Minjun .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (12) :2494-2502
[100]   ELITE cities: A low-carbon eco-city evaluation tool for China [J].
Zhou, Nan ;
He, Gang ;
Williams, Christopher ;
Fridley, David .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 48 :448-456