Analysis and Comparison of Bayesian Methods for Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation

被引:24
作者
Cheng, Yin-bao [1 ]
Chen, Xiao-huai [1 ]
Li, Hong-li [1 ]
Cheng, Zhen-ying [1 ]
Jiang, Rui [2 ]
Lu, Jing [3 ]
Fu, Hua-dong [3 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Instrument Sci & Optoelect Engn, Hefei 230009, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Xian North Electroopt Sci & Technol Def Co Ltd, Xian 710043, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] China Natl Accreditat Serv Conform Assessment, Beijing 100062, Peoples R China
关键词
SURFACES; GUM;
D O I
10.1155/2018/7509046
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Based on the Bayesian principle, the modern uncertainty evaluation methods can fully integrate prior and current sample information, determine the prior distribution according to historical information, and deduce the posterior distribution by integrating prior distribution and the current sample data with the Bayesian model. As such, it is possible to evaluate uncertainty, updating in real time the uncertainty of the measuring instrument according to regular measurement, and timely reflect the latest information on the accuracy of the measurement system. Based on the Bayesian information fusion and statistical inference principle, the model of uncertainty evaluation is established. The maximum entropy principle and the hill-climbing search optimization algorithm are introduced to determine the prior distribution probability density function and the sample information likelihood function. The probability density function of posterior distribution is obtained by the Bayesian formula to achieve the optimization estimation of uncertainty. Three methods of measurement uncertainty evaluation based on Bayesian analysis are introduced: the non informative prior, the conjugate prior, and the maximum entropy prior distribution. The advantages and limitations of each method are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Battistelli L., 2008, 2008 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM), P439, DOI 10.1109/SPEEDHAM.2008.4581209
[2]   Experts' knowledge renewal and maintenance actions effectiveness in high-mix low-volume industries, using Bayesian approach [J].
Ben Said, Anis ;
Shahzad, Muhammad Kashif ;
Zamai, Eric ;
Hubac, Stephane ;
Tollenaere, Michel .
COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2016, 18 (01) :193-213
[3]   Revision of the 'Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement'. Why and how [J].
Bich, Walter .
METROLOGIA, 2014, 51 (04) :S155-S158
[4]   Modelling and analysis of uncertainty in the form characterization of ultra-precision freeform surfaces on coordinate measuring machines [J].
Cheung, ChiFai ;
Ren, MingJun ;
Kong, LingBao ;
Whitehouse, David .
CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 63 (01) :481-484
[5]   Learning equivalence classes of Bayesian-network structures [J].
Chickering, DM .
JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2002, 2 (03) :445-498
[6]   GUM anniversary issue Foreword [J].
Cox, Maurice ;
Harris, Peter .
METROLOGIA, 2014, 51 (04) :S141-S143
[7]   Uncertainty of measurement and conformity assessment: a review [J].
Desimoni, Elio ;
Brunetti, Barbara .
ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 400 (06) :1729-1741
[8]   Bayesian regression versus application of least squares-an example [J].
Elster, Clemens ;
Wuebbeler, Gerd .
METROLOGIA, 2016, 53 (01) :S10-S16
[9]   Bayesian uncertainty analysis compared with the application of the GUM and its supplements [J].
Elster, Clemens .
METROLOGIA, 2014, 51 (04) :S159-S166
[10]  
GUM, 2008, EV MEAS DAT GUID EXP