A psychometric evaluation of the clinician-rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) in patients with bipolar disorder

被引:22
作者
Bernstein, Ira H. [2 ,3 ]
Rush, A. John [1 ,3 ]
Suppes, Trisha [1 ]
Trivedi, Madhukar H. [1 ]
Woo, Ada [2 ]
Kyutoku, Yasushi [2 ]
Crismon, M. Lynn [4 ]
Dennehy, Ellen [5 ]
Carmody, Thomas J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Psychiat, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Univ Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Clin Sci, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Coll Pharm, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[5] Purdue Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
depression; bipolar disorder; symptom measures; Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology; MEDICATION ALGORITHM PROJECT; REPORT QIDS-SR; SELF-REPORT; PHASE-3; TMAP-3; RATING-SCALE; IDS; RATIONALE; CRITERION; HAMILTON; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1002/mpr.285
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The clinician-rated, 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C-16) has been extensively evaluated in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). This report assesses the psychometric properties of the QIDS-C-16 in outpatients with bipolar disorder (BD, N = 405) and MDD (N = 547) and in bipolar patients in the depressed phase only (BD-D) (N = 99) enrolled in the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) using classical test theory (CTT) and the Samejima graded item response theory (IRT) model. Values of coefficient alpha were very similar in BD, MDD, and BD-D groups at baseline (alpha = 0.80-0.81) and at exit (alpha = 0.82-0.85). The QIDS-C-16 was unidimensional for all three groups. MDD and BD-D patients (n = 99) had comparable symptom levels. The BD-D patients (n = 99) had the most, and bipolar patients in the manic phase had the least depressive symptoms at baseline. IRT analyses indicated that the QIDS-C-16 was most sensitive to the measurement of depression for both MDD patients and for BD-D patients in the average range. The QIDS-C-16 is suitable for use with patients with BD and can be used as an outcome measure in trials enrolling both BD and MDD patients. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 146
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), V4th, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890423349
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Handbook of modern item response theory, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_5
[3]   THE USE OF RATING-SCALES EXEMPLIFIED BY A COMPARISON OF THE HAMILTON AND THE BECH-RAFAELSEN MELANCHOLIA SCALE [J].
BECH, P ;
RAFAELSEN, OJ .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1980, 62 :128-132
[4]   Scale matters: the need for a Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS) [J].
Berk, M ;
Malhi, GS ;
Mitchell, PB ;
Cahill, CM ;
Carman, AC ;
Hadzi-Pavlovic, D ;
Hawkins, MT ;
Tohen, M .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 110 :39-45
[5]  
Chioqueta Andrea P, 2003, Crisis, V24, P105, DOI 10.1027//0227-5910.24.3.105
[6]   Texas medication algorithm project: Definitions, rationale, and methods to develop medication algorithms [J].
Gilbert, DA ;
Altshuler, KZ ;
Rago, WV ;
Shon, SP ;
Crismon, L ;
Toprac, MG ;
Rush, AJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 59 (07) :345-351
[7]   A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION [J].
HAMILTON, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1960, 23 (01) :56-62
[8]  
Hamilton M., 1967, Br J Soc Clin Psychol, V6, P278, DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x
[10]   NOTE ON A CRITERION FOR NUMBER OF COMMON FACTORS [J].
HUMPHREY.LG ;
ILGEN, DR .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1969, 29 (03) :571-&