Combined biomass gasification, SOFC, IC engine, and waste heat recovery system for power and heat generation: Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, environmental (4E) evaluations

被引:238
作者
Wu, Zhen [1 ]
Zhu, Pengfei [1 ]
Yao, Jing [1 ]
Zhang, Shengan [1 ]
Ren, Jianwei [2 ]
Yang, Fusheng [1 ]
Zhang, Zaoxiao [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Chem Engn & Technol, Shaanxi Key Lab Energy Chem Proc Intensificat, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Johannesburg, Fac Engn & Built Environm FEBE, Dept Mech Engn Sci, Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, State Key Lab Multiphase Flow Power Engn, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hybrid system; SOFC; IC engine; Biomass gasification; Exergoeconomic analysis; OXIDE FUEL-CELL; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; HCCI ENGINE; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; STEAM GASIFICATION; STIRLING ENGINE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; HYBRID SYSTEM; PLANT; GASIFIER;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115794
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
A novel hybrid system using biomass as fuel for both power and heat generation, which consists of biomass gasification unit, solid oxide fuel cell, homogeneous charge compression ignition engine and waste heat recovery unit, is proposed in this work. Based on the modeling, the system is comprehensively evaluated by multiple approaches including energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses. It is found that the overall energy efficiency and exergy efficiency of the hybrid system could reach up to 68% and 51%, both of which are comparable to those of other reported hybrid fuel cell systems. The exergy destruction of the gasifier is the largest whose relative exergy destruction is up to 21.5%. The component of fuel cell contributes to 71% of the total power but with small relative exergy destruction. On the contrary, the HCCI engine contributes to less power but has larger exergy destruction compared to SOFC. The exergoeconomic analysis showed that the fuel cell component has a high exergoeconomic factor of 98.09% due to the large capital investment cost. By comparison, the component engine has much lower exergoeconomic factors of 5.41%. The cost of exergetic product of the hybrid system is 9.7 $/GJ. Besides, the proposed hybrid system presents a low carbon dioxide emission of about 0.119 to 0.139 t/GJ, which indicates few environmental impacts for the system. These results reveal that the proposed biomass-fueled hybrid system is high-efficiency, low-cost and clean for both power and heat generation, which could be promising candidate as advanced energy conversion technology in practical applications.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Design and exergy analysis of waste heat recovery system and gas engine for power generation in Tehran cement factory [J].
Naeimi, Abbas ;
Bidi, Mokhtar ;
Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossein ;
Kumar, Ravinder ;
Sadeghzadeh, Milad ;
Nazari, Mohammad Alhuyi .
THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2019, 9 :299-307
[22]   Exergy, economic, exergoeconomic and environmental (4E) analyses and multi-objective optimization of a PEMFC system for coalbed methane recovery [J].
Xu, Aixiang ;
Yang, Lanxiang ;
Huang, Wei ;
Zhang, Yunchang ;
Long, Haiwu ;
Liu, Zhiqiang ;
Deng, Chengwei ;
Yang, Sheng .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 297
[23]   Optimal 4E analyses of an innovative polygeneration system for freshwater, hydrogen, and power production by waste heat recovery of ship engine and thermal energy storage [J].
Noorbakhsh, Hosein ;
Chaboki, Yadollah Aghdoud ;
Rezvani, Abdollah .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2025, 127 :405-420
[24]   Experimental and modeling investigation of an integrated biomass gasifier-engine-generator system for power generation and waste heat recovery [J].
Li, C. Y. ;
Shen, Ye ;
Wu, J. Y. ;
Dai, Y. J. ;
Wang, Chi-Hwa .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 199
[25]   Solar district heating system with large heat storage: Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analysis [J].
Gao, Meng ;
Furbo, Simon ;
Xiang, Yutong ;
Fan, Jianhua ;
Wang, Dengjia ;
Tian, Zhiyong .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 314
[27]   Combined heat and power system based on a proton conducting SOFC and a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle triggered by biomass gasification [J].
Cao, Yan ;
Dhahad, Hayder A. ;
Rajhi, Ali A. ;
Alamri, Sagr ;
Anqi, Ali E. ;
El-Shafay, A. S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (08) :5439-5452
[28]   Exergy and exergoeconomic analysis and optimisation of diesel engine based Combined Heat and Power (CHP) system using genetic algorithm [J].
Mohammadkhani, Farzad ;
Khalilarya, Shahram ;
Mirzaee, Iraj .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2013, 12 (02) :139-161
[29]   Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental analysis of waste heat source heat pump industrial steam generation system [J].
Yin, Hang ;
Ying, Shicheng ;
Liu, Guangbin ;
Yang, Qichao ;
Zhao, Yuanyang ;
Li, Liansheng .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 330
[30]   Comparative analysis of a CCHP system based on municipal solid waste (MSW) gasification using micro gas turbine and internal combustion engine: Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental (4E) perspectives [J].
Kashani, Behzad Omidi ;
Saray, Rahim Khoshbakhti ;
Kheiri, Reza .
ENERGY, 2025, 326