Combined biomass gasification, SOFC, IC engine, and waste heat recovery system for power and heat generation: Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, environmental (4E) evaluations

被引:217
|
作者
Wu, Zhen [1 ]
Zhu, Pengfei [1 ]
Yao, Jing [1 ]
Zhang, Shengan [1 ]
Ren, Jianwei [2 ]
Yang, Fusheng [1 ]
Zhang, Zaoxiao [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Chem Engn & Technol, Shaanxi Key Lab Energy Chem Proc Intensificat, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Johannesburg, Fac Engn & Built Environm FEBE, Dept Mech Engn Sci, Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, State Key Lab Multiphase Flow Power Engn, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hybrid system; SOFC; IC engine; Biomass gasification; Exergoeconomic analysis; OXIDE FUEL-CELL; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; HCCI ENGINE; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; STEAM GASIFICATION; STIRLING ENGINE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; HYBRID SYSTEM; PLANT; GASIFIER;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115794
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
A novel hybrid system using biomass as fuel for both power and heat generation, which consists of biomass gasification unit, solid oxide fuel cell, homogeneous charge compression ignition engine and waste heat recovery unit, is proposed in this work. Based on the modeling, the system is comprehensively evaluated by multiple approaches including energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses. It is found that the overall energy efficiency and exergy efficiency of the hybrid system could reach up to 68% and 51%, both of which are comparable to those of other reported hybrid fuel cell systems. The exergy destruction of the gasifier is the largest whose relative exergy destruction is up to 21.5%. The component of fuel cell contributes to 71% of the total power but with small relative exergy destruction. On the contrary, the HCCI engine contributes to less power but has larger exergy destruction compared to SOFC. The exergoeconomic analysis showed that the fuel cell component has a high exergoeconomic factor of 98.09% due to the large capital investment cost. By comparison, the component engine has much lower exergoeconomic factors of 5.41%. The cost of exergetic product of the hybrid system is 9.7 $/GJ. Besides, the proposed hybrid system presents a low carbon dioxide emission of about 0.119 to 0.139 t/GJ, which indicates few environmental impacts for the system. These results reveal that the proposed biomass-fueled hybrid system is high-efficiency, low-cost and clean for both power and heat generation, which could be promising candidate as advanced energy conversion technology in practical applications.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A conceptual hydrogen, heat and power polygeneration system based on biomass gasification, SOFC and waste heat recovery units: Energy, exergy, economic and emergy (4E) assessment
    Tera, Ibrahim
    Zhang, Shengan
    Liu, Guilian
    ENERGY, 2024, 295
  • [2] A novel negative carbon-emission, cooling, and power generation system based on combined LNG regasification and waste heat recovery: Energy, exergy, economic, environmental (4E) evaluations
    Tian, Zhen
    Qi, Zhixin
    Gan, Wanlong
    Tian, Molin
    Gao, Wenzhong
    ENERGY, 2022, 257
  • [3] Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, environmental (4E) evaluation and multi-objective optimization of a novel SOFC-ICE-SCO2-HRSG hybrid system for power and heat generation
    Wang, Zhe
    Ma, Yue
    Cao, Menglong
    Jiang, Yuemao
    Ji, Yulong
    Han, Fenghui
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 291
  • [4] Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic analyses of plastic waste-to-energy integrated gasification combined cycles with and without heat recovery at a gasifier
    Lee, Beomhui
    Im, Seong-kyun
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 355
  • [5] Energy, exergy, economic and exergoeconomic (4E) multicriteria analysis of an industrial waste heat valorization system through district heating
    Fito, Jaume
    Ramousse, Julien
    Hodencq, Sacha
    Wurtz, Frederic
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2020, 42
  • [6] Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic evaluations of a combined cycle with three configurations for heat recovery steam generator
    Samie, Behnam
    Azad, Masoud Torabi
    Salehi, Gholamreza
    Lari, Kamran
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2025,
  • [7] Evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective Exergoeconomic optimization of Biomass Waste Gasification Combined Heat and Power System
    Fakhimghanbarzadeh, B.
    Farhanieh, B.
    Marzi, H.
    Javadzadegan, A.
    2009 7TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 361 - +
  • [8] Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and environmental (4E) analyses of thermal power plants for municipal solid waste to energy application in Bangladesh
    Adnan, Adib
    Mahmud, Shadman
    Uddin, Mohammed Raihan
    Modi, Anish
    Ehsan, M. Monjurul
    Salehin, Sayedus
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 134 : 136 - 148
  • [9] Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental (4E) analysis of a distributed generation solar-assisted CCHP (combined cooling, heating and power) gas turbine system
    Wang, Jiangjiang
    Lu, Zherui
    Li, Meng
    Lior, Noam
    Li, Weihua
    ENERGY, 2019, 175 : 1246 - 1258
  • [10] Energy, exergy and economic (3E) evaluations of a novel power generation system combining supercritical water gasification of coal with chemical heat recovery
    Chen, Zhewen
    Zhou, Qi
    Zhang, Yuming
    Zhang, Xiaosong
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 276