A PILOT RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF FLEXION-DISTRACTION DOSAGE FOR CHIROPRACTIC TREATMENT OF LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS

被引:19
作者
Cambron, Jerrilyn A. [1 ]
Schneider, Michael [2 ]
Dexheimer, Jennifer M. [1 ]
Iannelli, Grant [3 ]
Chang, Mabel [4 ]
Terhorst, Lauren [5 ]
Cramer, Gregory D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Res, Lombard, IL 60148 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Phys Therapy, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] ATS Inst Technol, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Natl Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Sci, St Petersburg, FL USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Occupat Therapy, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Spinal Stenosis; Manipulation; Chiropractic; Low Back Pain; Complementary Therapies; Lumbar Vertebrae; CLINICAL-TRIAL; BACK; EXERCISE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY; KNEE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.05.005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this pilot clinical trial was to assess the feasibility of recruiting older adults with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) into a clinical trial that used different dosages of flexion-distraction manipulation. Methods: This randomized controlled trial used a 4-group design. Three groups consisted of chiropractic flexion-distraction manipulation applied at different dosages (8, 12, or 18 treatments). The fourth group was given 8 treatments of placebo care. Feasibility measures included recruitment goals, adherence to various treatment schedules, credibility of the placebo treatment, and rates of adverse events. The primary outcome measure was the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, a validated self-report of LSS symptom severity and physical function. Results: The recruitment and adherence goals of the study were met with a total of 60 subjects randomized (n = 15 per group) and most subjects attending at least 75% of their scheduled visits. No adverse events were reported by any of the subjects in the trial. Our placebo treatment did not appear to be credible; most subjects correctly guessed that they were receiving a placebo treatment. Between-group effect size estimates were small, indicating larger samples are needed for future studies. Conclusion: This pilot study showed that it is feasible to recruit patients with LSS and that most subjects will adhere to a 6-week treatment schedule. The information gained from this trial will be useful to inform the design of larger trials.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 406
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Alvarez JA, 1998, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V57, P1825
[2]   Nonoperative Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication A Systematic Review [J].
Ammendolia, Carlo ;
Stuber, Kent ;
de Bruin, Linda K. ;
Furlan, Andrea D. ;
Kennedy, Carol A. ;
Rampersaud, Yoga Raja ;
Steenstra, Ivan A. ;
Pennick, Victoria .
SPINE, 2012, 37 (10) :E609-E616
[3]  
[Anonymous], JOB ANAL CHIROPRACTI
[4]  
[Anonymous], TOP INTEGR HLTH CARE
[5]   The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis [J].
Barz, Thomas ;
Melloh, Markus ;
Staub, Lukas ;
Roeder, Christoph ;
Lange, Joern ;
Smiszek, Franz-Georg ;
Theis, Jean-Claude ;
Merk, Harry R. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (05) :686-690
[6]  
Bodack MP, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P144
[7]   One-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing flexion distraction with an exercise program for chronic low-back pain [J].
Cambron, Jerrilyn A. ;
Gudavalli, M. Ram ;
Hedeker, Donald ;
McGregor, Marion ;
Jedlicka, James ;
Keenum, Michael ;
Ghanayem, Alexander J. ;
Patwardhan, Avinash G. ;
Furner, Sylvia E. .
JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2006, 12 (07) :659-668
[8]   RECRUITMENT METHODS AND COSTS FOR A RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CHIROPRACTIC CARE FOR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS: A SINGLE-SITE PILOT STUDY [J].
Cambron, Jerrilyn A. ;
Dexheimer, Jennifer M. ;
Chang, Mabel ;
Cramer, Gregory D. .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 33 (01) :56-61
[9]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2009, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V58, P421
[10]  
Christensen M., 2005, JOB ANAL CHIROPRACTI