Why not to green a city? Institutional barriers to preserving urban ecosystem services

被引:95
作者
Kronenberg, Jakub [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lodz, Dept Int Econ, PL-90255 Lodz, Poland
关键词
Urban trees; Street trees; Urban greening; Institutional failures; Social empowerment; Poland; TREE-PLANTING PROGRAMS; LOS-ANGELES; HOUSING-MARKET; STREET TREES; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; CITIES; COVER; AREAS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This article investigates the institutional context of urban greening, with a particular focus on institutional failures that hinder urban ecosystems' capacity to provide urban inhabitants with services. It is based on a literature review and a study of expert opinions carried out in Poland (with 103 experts involved in the management of urban trees as respondents). The institutional failures covered by this article include government and social empowerment failures. The most important government failures include insufficient funds and various problems related to unprofessional maintenance of trees and its supervision. The most important social empowerment failures include lack of mobilization, related to under-appreciation of the importance of trees and disservices related to trees. While the current discourse on ecosystem services focuses on raising awareness of the benefits that nature provides, this study demonstrates that protecting urban ecosystems' capacity to provide us with such services requires a broad institutional reform. This need is particularly relevant in post-socialist, post-transition countries, such as Poland. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 227
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Measuring social-ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services [J].
Andersson, E. ;
Barthel, S. ;
Ahrne, K. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2007, 17 (05) :1267-1278
[2]   The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy [J].
Braat, Leon C. ;
de Groot, Rudolf .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2012, 1 (01) :4-15
[3]  
Braverman I., 2008, Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, V45, P81
[4]   An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation [J].
Cowling, Richard M. ;
Egoh, Benis ;
Knight, Andrew T. ;
O'Farrell, Patrick J. ;
Reyers, Belinda ;
Rouget'll, Mathieu ;
Roux, Dirk J. ;
Welz, Adam ;
Wilhelm-Rechman, Angelika .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (28) :9483-9488
[5]   Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver [J].
Daily, Gretchen C. ;
Polasky, Stephen ;
Goldstein, Joshua ;
Kareiva, Peter M. ;
Mooney, Harold A. ;
Pejchar, Liba ;
Ricketts, Taylor H. ;
Salzman, James ;
Shallenberger, Robert .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (01) :21-28
[6]   Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making [J].
de Groot, R. S. ;
Alkemade, R. ;
Braat, L. ;
Hein, L. ;
Willemen, L. .
ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (03) :260-272
[7]   Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units [J].
de Groot, Rudolf ;
Brander, Luke ;
van der Ploeg, Sander ;
Costanza, Robert ;
Bernard, Florence ;
Braat, Leon ;
Christie, Mike ;
Crossman, Neville ;
Ghermandi, Andrea ;
Hein, Lars ;
Hussain, Salman ;
Kumar, Pushpam ;
McVittie, Alistair ;
Portela, Rosimeiry ;
Rodriguez, Luis C. ;
ten Brink, Patrick ;
van Beukeringh, Pieter .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2012, 1 (01) :50-61
[8]  
Devers K J, 2000, Educ Health (Abingdon), V13, P263
[9]  
DWYER J F, 1991, Journal of Arboriculture, V17, P276