A Comparative Survey on Supervised Classifiers for Face Recognition

被引:0
作者
Arriaga-Gomez, Miguel F. [1 ]
de Mendizabal-Vazquez, Ignacio [1 ]
Ros-Gomez, Rodrigo [2 ]
Sanchez-Avila, Carmen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Ctr Domot Integral, Grp Biometr Biosignals & Secur, GB2S, Campus Montegancedo, Madrid 28223, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, ETS Ingenieros Telecomunicac, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
来源
2014 INTERNATIONAL CARNAHAN CONFERENCE ON SECURITY TECHNOLOGY (ICCST) | 2014年
关键词
Biometrics; face recognition; supervised classifiers; machine learning; PCA; LDA; PATTERN-CLASSIFICATION; ALGORITHMS; FEATURES; LDA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
During the last decades, several different techniques have been proposed for computer recognition of human faces. A further step in the development of these biometrics is to implement them in portable devices, such as mobile phones. Due to this devices' features and limitations it is necessary to select, among the currently available algorithms, the one with the best performance in terms of algorithm overall elapsed time and correct identification rates. The aim of this paper is to offer a complementary study to previous works, focusing on the performance of different supervised classifiers, such as the Normal Bayesian Classifier, Neural Architectures or distance-based algorithms. In addition, we analyse all the proposed algorithms' efficiency over public face databases (ORL, FERET, NIST and the Face Recognition Data from the Essex University). Each one of these databases contains a different number of individuals and particular samples and they present variations among images from the same user (scale, pose, expression, illumination,...). We expect to simulate many different situations which take place when dealing with face recognition on mobile phones. In order to get a complete comparison, all the proposed algorithms have been implemented and run over all the databases, using the same computer. Different parametrizations for each algorithm have also been tested. Bayesian classifiers and distance-based algorithms turn out to be the most suitable, as their parametrization is simple, the training stage is not as time consuming as others' and classification results are satisfying.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Ahmad F., 2013, INT J COMPUTER SCI I, V9, P3
[2]   Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection [J].
Belhumeur, PN ;
Hespanha, JP ;
Kriegman, DJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 19 (07) :711-720
[3]   FACE RECOGNITION - FEATURES VERSUS TEMPLATES [J].
BRUNELLI, R ;
POGGIO, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1993, 15 (10) :1042-1052
[4]  
Chauhan T., 2013, INT J ADV INNOVATIVE, V2, P256
[5]   NEAREST NEIGHBOR PATTERN CLASSIFICATION [J].
COVER, TM ;
HART, PE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 1967, 13 (01) :21-+
[6]   Feature extraction using discrete cosine transform and discrimination power analysis with a face recognition technology [J].
Dabbaghchian, Saeed ;
Ghaemmaghami, Masoumeh P. ;
Aghagolzadeh, Ali .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2010, 43 (04) :1431-1440
[7]  
Gross R, 2005, HANDBOOK OF FACE RECOGNITION, P301, DOI 10.1007/0-387-27257-7_14
[8]   Face detection:: A survey [J].
Hjelmås, E ;
Low, BK .
COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2001, 83 (03) :236-274
[9]  
Langley P., 1994, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference (1994), P399
[10]   PATTERN-CLASSIFICATION USING NEURAL NETWORKS [J].
LIPPMANN, RP .
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE, 1989, 27 (11) :47-64