Food Bank Donations in the United States: A Landscape Review of Federal Policies

被引:11
作者
Hudak, Katelin M. [1 ]
Friedman, Emily [2 ]
Johnson, Joelle [2 ]
Benjamin-Neelon, Sara E. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Soc, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Ctr Sci Publ Interest, Washington, DC 20005 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Lerner Ctr Publ Hlth Promot, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
emergency food; food insecurity; food security; legislation; regulations; statutes; nutrition; healthy; NUTRITIONAL QUALITY; INCOME; PROGRAM; USERS; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/nu12123764
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Rates of food insecurity have increased substantially in the United States (US), and more families are turning to the charitable food system to help meet their needs. Prior studies have examined the nutritional quality of foods offered through food banks, but little is known about what government policies may shape the healthy food donation landscape. The purpose of this study was to review US federal policies that impact food and beverage donations to food banks and assess whether policies encourage healthy food donations. In spring 2020, two researchers independently reviewed federal food and beverage donation policies using predefined search terms in two legal databases. We identified six categories of policies based on the existing food donation literature and themes that emerged in the policy review. We identified 42 federal policies spanning six categories that addressed food and beverage donations to food banks. The largest category was "government programs," with 19 (45%) policies. The next largest category was "donation via schools," with 12 (29%) policies. However, no policies specifically addressed the nutritional quality of food donations. There is an opportunity for the federal government to strengthen food bank donation policies and improve the nutritional quality of donated foods and beverages.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, History, background, and goal of the supplemental nutrition assistance program, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Examining the evidence to define benefit adequacy
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015-2020
[3]   Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality-a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies [J].
Aune, Dagfinn ;
Giovannucci, Edward ;
Boffetta, Paolo ;
Fadnes, Lars T. ;
Keum, NaNa ;
Norat, Teresa ;
Greenwood, Darren C. ;
Riboli, Elio ;
Vatten, Lars J. ;
Tonstad, Serena .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (03) :1029-1056
[4]   State Regulations to Support Children's Cultural and Religious Food Preferences in Early Care and Education [J].
Ayers Looby, Anna ;
Frost, Natasha ;
Gonzalez-Nahm, Sarah ;
Grossman, Elyse R. ;
Ralston Aoki, Julie ;
Benjamin-Neelon, Sara E. .
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2020, 24 (02) :121-126
[5]  
Bauer L., BROOKINGS COVID 19 C
[6]   State Variations in Infant Feeding Regulations for Child Care [J].
Benjamin-Neelon, Sara E. ;
Gonzalez-Nahm, Sarah ;
Grossman, Elyse ;
Davis, Melanie L. ;
Neelon, Brian ;
Looby, Anna Ayers ;
Frost, Natasha .
PEDIATRICS, 2017, 140 (06)
[7]  
Broad Leib E.M., 2020, US LEGAL GUIDE FOOD
[8]  
Butler Patrick., 2008, GUARDIAN
[9]  
Campbell E., 2015, Nutrition-focused food banking
[10]   Food Preferences of Users of the Emergency Food System [J].
Campbell, Elizabeth ;
Hudson, Heather ;
Webb, Karen ;
Crawford, Patricia B. .
JOURNAL OF HUNGER & ENVIRONMENTAL NUTRITION, 2011, 6 (02) :179-187