High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies

被引:104
|
作者
Hardy, Luke A. [1 ]
Vinnichenko, Viktoriya [2 ]
Fried, Nathaniel M. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, Dept Phys & Opt Sci, 9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Moscow Engn Phys Inst, Moscow, Russia
[3] Carolinas Med Ctr, McKay Dept Urol, Charlotte, NC 28203 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Med Sch, Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
ablation; holmium; kidney stones; stone fragments; thulium; IN-VITRO INVESTIGATIONS; YAG LASER; PULSE DURATION; TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENCE; LITHOTRIPSY; RETROPULSION; FREQUENCY; ABSORPTION; PROPULSION; SETTINGS;
D O I
10.1002/lsm.23057
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Objectives The experimental Thulium fiber laser (TFL) is currently being studied as a potential alternative to the gold standard Holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy. Recent advances in both Holmium and TFL technology allow operation at similar laser parameters for direct comparison. The use of a "dusting" mode with low pulse energy (0.2-0.4 J) and high pulse rate (50-80 Hz) settings, is gaining popularity in lithotripsy due to the desire to produce smaller residual stone fragments during ablation, capable of being spontaneously passed through the urinary tract. Methods In this study, Holmium and TFL were directly compared for 'dusting' using three laser groups, G1: 0.2 J/50 Hz/10 W; G2: 0.2 J/80 Hz/16 W; and G3: 0.4 J/80 Hz/32 W. Holmium laser pulse durations ranged from 200 to 350 mu s, while TFL pulse durations ranged from 500 to 1,000 mu s, due to technical limitations for both laser systems. An experimental setup consisting of 1 x 1 cm cuvette with 1 mm sieve was used with continuous laser operation time limited to <= 5 minutes. Calcium oxalate monohydrate stone samples with a sample size of n = 5 were used for each group, with average initial stone mass ranging from 216 to 297 mg among groups. Results Holmium laser ablation rates were lower than for TFL at all three settings (G1: 0.3 +/- 0.2 vs. 0.8 +/- 0.2; G2: 0.6 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.0 +/- 0.4; G3: 0.7 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.9 mg/s). The TFL also produced a greater percentage by mass of stone dust (fragments <0.5 mm) than Holmium laser. For all three settings combined, one out of 15 (7%) stones treated with Holmium laser were completely fragmented in <= 5 minutes compared to nine out of 15 (60%) stones treated with TFL. Conclusions These preliminary studies demonstrate that the TFL is a promising alternative laser for lithotripsy when operated in dusting mode, producing higher stone ablation rates and smaller stone fragments than the Holmium laser. Clinical studies are warranted. Lasers Surg. Med. 51:522-530, 2019. (c) 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 530
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Holmium:YAG vs Thulium Fiber Laser Dusting of Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate Stones
    Hardy, Luke A.
    Vinnichenko, Viktoriya
    Fried, Nathaniel M.
    THERAPEUTICS AND DIAGNOSTICS IN UROLOGY 2019, 2019, 10852
  • [2] Proximal Fiber Tip Damage during Holmium: YAG and Thulium Fiber Laser Ablation of Kidney Stones
    Wilson, Christopher R.
    Hardy, Luke A.
    Irby, Pierce B.
    Fried, Nathaniel M.
    PHOTONIC THERAPEUTICS AND DIAGNOSTICS XII, 2016, 9689
  • [3] Thulium fiber laser versus high-power Holmium:YAG laser in mini-endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for treatment of kidney stones: a practical comparison
    Vergamini, L.
    Ito, W.
    Choi, N.
    Valadon, C.
    Du, H. E.
    Sardiu, M. E.
    Whiles, B.
    Neff, D.
    Duchene, D.
    Molina, W.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S518 - S519
  • [4] SUPERPULSED THULIUM FIBER™ VERSUS HIGH-POWER HOLMIUM:YAG LASER IN MINI-ENDOSCOPIC COMBINED INTRARENAL SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF KIDNEY STONES: A PRACTICAL COMPARISON
    Vergamini, Lucas B.
    Ito, Willian
    Choi, Nicholas
    Valadon, Crystal
    Sardiu, Mihaela E.
    Du, Holly E.
    Whiles, Bristol
    Neff, Donald
    Duchene, David
    Molina, Wilson R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E1263 - E1264
  • [5] HOLMIUM:YAG (HO:YAG) VERSUS THULIUM FIBER LASER (TFL) FOR TREATMENT OF UPPER URINARY TRACT CALCULI IN DUSTING MODE: A CLINICAL COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY, EFFICACY AND COSTS EFFECTIVENESS
    Ghazi, Ahmed
    Khalil, Mahmoud
    Feng, Changyong
    Quarrier, Scott
    Jain, Rajat
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E925 - E926
  • [6] Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser
    Olivier Traxer
    Etienne Xavier Keller
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 1883 - 1894
  • [7] Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser
    Traxer, Olivier
    Keller, Etienne Xavier
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (08) : 1883 - 1894
  • [8] Holmium:YAG (λ=2120 nm) vs. Thulium Fiber Laser (λ=1908 nm) Ablation of Kidney Stones: Thresholds, Rates, and Retropulsion
    Blackmon, Richard L.
    Irby, Pierce B.
    Fried, Nathaniel M.
    PHOTONIC THERAPEUTICS AND DIAGNOSTICS VII, 2011, 7883
  • [9] Comparing dusting and fragmenting efficiency using the new SuperPulsed thulium fiber laser versus a 120 W Holmium:YAG laser
    Chew, Ben H.
    Koo, Kyo Chul
    Halawani, Abdulghafour
    Lundeen, Colin J.
    Knudsen, Bodo E.
    Molina, Wilson R.
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2023, 64 (03) : 265 - 271
  • [10] Comparing outcomes of thulium fiber laser versus high-power Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy in pediatric patients managed with RIRS for kidney stones. A multicenter retrospective study
    Candela, Luigi
    Solano, Catalina
    Castellani, Daniele
    Teoh, Jeremy Y.
    Tanidir, Yiloren
    Fong, Khi Y.
    Vaddi, Chandramohan
    Sinha, Mriganka Mani
    Ragoori, Deepak
    Somani, Bhaskar K.
    Traxer, Olivier
    Gauhar, Vineet
    MINERVA PEDIATRICS, 2023,