A fast algorithm for 3D reconstruction of complex defect profiles for magnetic flux leakage inspection

被引:4
|
作者
Wu, Z. N. [1 ]
Wang, L. X. [2 ]
Wang, J. F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Engn, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ, Coll Comp Sci & Engn, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[3] China Natl Offshore Oil Corp, Beijing 100010, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
SIGNAL; INVERSION; FIELD; REGULARIZATION; IMPLICIT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1784/insi.2018.60.6.317
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
In this paper, a fast and effective algorithm is proposed for the reconstruction of complex defect profiles for magnetic flux leakage (MFL) inspection, which is the most widely used non-destructive testing (NDT) technique for tanks and pipelines. A Gauss-Newton optimisation procedure is used to reconstruct the depth profile by optimising the parameters of the analytical model. The space mapping (SM) technique is employed to minimise the misalignment between the 'coarse' analytical model and the 'fine' finite element method (FEM) model. A region growing (RG)-based evaluation method is used to locate defect signals and estimate the opening shape of the defect, which reduces the number of optimisation parameters. To demonstrate the accuracy of the proposed inversion algorithm, the procedure is tested with defects of complex shapes from simulated MFL signals under different degrees of freedom (DOFs). The procedure is also tested using the experimental data of two metal loss defects. In all cases, the proposed algorithm shows good agreement between the actual and the reconstructed defect profiles, with fast convergence speed.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 325
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D magnetic field sensing for magnetic flux leakage defect characterisation
    Wilson, JW
    Tian, GY
    INSIGHT, 2006, 48 (06) : 357 - 359
  • [2] Fast Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal Inversion for the Reconstruction of Arbitrary Defect Profiles in Steel Using Finite Elements
    Priewald, Robin H.
    Magele, Christian
    Ledger, Paul D.
    Pearson, Neil R.
    Mason, John S. D.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2013, 49 (01) : 506 - 516
  • [3] Defect separation considerations in magnetic flux leakage inspection
    Mandache, C
    Shiari, B
    Clapham, L
    INSIGHT, 2005, 47 (05) : 269 - 273
  • [4] 3-D Defect Profile Reconstruction from Magnetic Flux Leakage Signals in Pipeline Inspection Using a Hybrid Inversion Method
    Chen, Junjie
    APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL ELECTROMAGNETICS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2017, 32 (09): : 826 - 832
  • [5] 3-D Defect Profile Reconstruction from Magnetic Flux Leakage Signals in Pipeline Inspection Using a Hybrid Inversion Method
    Chen, Junjie
    APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL ELECTROMAGNETICS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2017, 32 (03): : 268 - 274
  • [6] Fast reconstruction of defect profiles from magnetic flux leakage measurements using a RBFNN based error adjustment methodology
    Feng, Jian
    Li, Fangming
    Lu, Senxiang
    Liu, Jinhai
    IET SCIENCE MEASUREMENT & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 11 (03) : 262 - 269
  • [7] Defect signal enhancement in inspection lines by magnetic flux leakage
    Etcheverry, J
    Pignotti, A
    Sánchez, G
    Stickar, P
    REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOLS 22A AND 22B, 2003, 20 : 1721 - 1727
  • [8] Experiment and simulation study of 3D magnetic field sensing for magnetic flux leakage defect characterisation
    Li, Yong
    Wilson, John
    Tian, Gui Yun
    NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 40 (02) : 179 - 184
  • [9] 3D magnetic field analysis and defect characterization of pulsed magnetic flux leakage field testing
    Tang, Ying
    Luo, Feilu
    Pan, Mengchun
    Meng, Xianggui
    Yi Qi Yi Biao Xue Bao/Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2009, 30 (12): : 2506 - 2510
  • [10] A Heuristic Algorithm for the Reconstruction and Extraction of Defect Shape Features in Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing
    John, Alimey Fred
    Bai, Libing
    Cheng, Yuhua
    Yu, Haichao
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2020, 69 (11) : 9062 - 9071