A method for evaluating the performance of green buildings with a focus on user experience

被引:39
作者
Kim, Mi Jeong [1 ]
Oh, Myoung Won [1 ]
Kim, Jeong Tai [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Housing & Interior Design, Seoul 130701, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Yongin 446701, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Green building rating system; User experience; User-oriented factors; Qualitative evaluation; Visualization; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; POSTOCCUPANCY EVALUATION; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; INTELLIGENT; SELECTION; SYSTEMS; COMFORT; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.049
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Since the early 1990s, various green building rating systems have been proposed and continuously elaborated through exhaustive studies. Most efforts in this area can be divided into two main parts; (i) development of green building rating systems through identifying relevant rating criteria; (ii) assessment of building rating systems for validity. Studies on the rating criteria for green buildings have mainly focused on the development of the items for evaluating buildings' energy performance. Studies on the assessment of building rating systems have emphasized the effectiveness of such systems. The existing studies in this area adopt mostly quantitative methods, so there is a lack of qualitative evaluation regarding users' interaction with green buildings. Our research aims to develop a method for evaluating green building performance, which includes user experience. In order to assess the proposed method, we conducted a case study, in which we used Korea's Green Building Certification Criteria (KGBCC) to evaluate the performance of a KGBC-certified green apartment. We have used a customized method, with a focus on user-oriented factors, to present the results. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 210
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings [J].
ALwaer, H. ;
Clements-Croome, D. J. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 45 (04) :799-807
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, PSYCHOL ATTITUDES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, HDB ENV SOCIOLOGY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, 9241141998E ISOIEC
[5]   A choice experiment to estimate the effect of green experience on preferences and willingness-to-pay for green building attributes [J].
Chau, C. K. ;
Tse, M. S. ;
Chung, K. Y. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 45 (11) :2553-2561
[6]   A multicriteria lifespan energy efficiency approach to intelligent building assessment [J].
Chen, Z ;
Clements-Croome, D ;
Hong, J ;
Li, H ;
Xu, Q .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2006, 38 (05) :393-409
[7]   Post-occupancy evaluation of 20 office buildings as basis for future IEQ standards and guidelines [J].
Choi, Joon-Ho ;
Loftness, Vivian ;
Aziz, Azizan .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 46 :167-175
[8]  
Clements-Croome DJ., 2004, INTELLIGENT BUILDING
[9]   Assessing building performance in use 1: the Probe process [J].
Cohen, R ;
Standeven, M ;
Bordass, B ;
Leaman, A .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2001, 29 (02) :85-102
[10]   Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods [J].
Cole, RJ .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 1998, 26 (01) :3-16