Comparing sensitivity of ecotoxicological effect endpoints between laboratory and field

被引:44
|
作者
Selck, H
Riemann, B
Christoffersen, K
Forbes, VE
Gustavson, K
Hansen, BW
Jacobsen, JA
Kusk, OK
Petersen, S
机构
[1] Roskilde Univ Ctr, Dept Life Sci & Chem, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[2] Natl Environm Res Inst, Dept Marine Ecol & Microbiol, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Freshwater Biol Lab, DK-3400 Hillerod, Denmark
[4] Water & Environm, DK-2970 Horsholm, Denmark
[5] Analyt Instruments As, DK-3500 Vaerlose, Denmark
[6] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
effect parameters; extrapolation methods; enclosure; tributyltin; linear alkylbenzene sulfonates;
D O I
10.1006/eesa.2002.2172
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Extrapolating toxicant effects with a fixed application factor (AF) approach or one of the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) models presumes that toxicant effects on single, individual-level endpoints reflect effects at the ecosystem level. Measured effect concentrations on plankton from multispecies field tests using tributyltin (TBT) and linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS) were compared with published laboratory single-species test results and measured in situ concentrations. Extrapolation methods were evaluated by comparing predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs), calculated by AF and SSD models with NOECs and E(L)C(50)s obtained from field studies. Overall, structural parameters were more sensitive than functional ones. Measured effect concentrations covered approximately the same range between laboratory and field experiments. Both SSD and AF approaches provide PNECs that appear to be protective for ecosystems. The AF approach is simpler to apply than the SSD models and results in PNECs that are no less conservative. Calculated PNEC values and the lowest field effect concentrations were lower than measured environmental concentrations for both substances, indicating that they may pose a risk to marine ecosystems. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 112
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing laboratory and field measured bioaccumulation endpoints
    Burkhard, Lawrence P.
    Arnot, Jon A.
    Embry, Michelle R.
    Farley, Kevin J.
    Hoke, Robert A.
    Kitano, Masaru
    Leslie, Heather A.
    Lotufo, Guilherme R.
    Parkerton, Thomas F.
    Sappington, Keith G.
    Tomy, Gregg T.
    Woodburn, Kent B.
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 8 (01) : 17 - 31
  • [2] Comparing growth development of Myriophyllum spp. in laboratory and field experiments for ecotoxicological testing
    Knauer, Katja
    Mohr, Silvia
    Feiler, Ute
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2008, 15 (04) : 322 - 331
  • [3] Comparing growth development of Myriophyllum spp. in laboratory and field experiments for ecotoxicological testing
    Katja Knauer
    Silvia Mohr
    Ute Feiler
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research - International, 2008, 15
  • [4] Sensitivity of submersed freshwater macrophytes and endpoints in laboratory toxicity tests
    Arts, Gertie H. P.
    Belgers, J. Dick M.
    Hoekzema, Conny H.
    Thissen, Jac T. N. M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2008, 153 (01) : 199 - 206
  • [6] Evaluation of Phototrophic Stream Biofilms Under Stress: Comparing Traditional and Novel Ecotoxicological Endpoints After Exposure to Diuron
    Sgier, Linn
    Behra, Renata
    Schoenenberger, Rene
    Kroll, Alexandra
    Zupanic, Anze
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [7] RELATION BETWEEN TOXICITY IN LABORATORY AND POND - AN ECOTOXICOLOGICAL STUDY WITH CHLORPYRIFOS
    VANWIJNGAARDEN, R
    LEEUWANGH, P
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE FACULTY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF GHENT, VOL 54, PTS 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B: 198, 1989, 41 : 1061 - 1069
  • [8] Laboratory vs. field measurement endpoints: a contaminated sediment perspective
    Ankley, GT
    ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS, 1997, : 115 - 122
  • [9] Preference heterogeneity in experiments: Comparing the field and laboratory
    Andersen, Steffen
    Harrison, Glenn W.
    Lau, Morten Igel
    Rutstrom, E. Elisabet
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2010, 73 (02) : 209 - 224
  • [10] Comparing laboratory and field durability testing of stone
    Wonneberger, B
    Bortz, SA
    DURABILITY OF BUILDING MATERIALS AND COMPONENTS 8, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 624 - 634