Noise comparison of triple frequency GNSS carrier phase, doppler and pseudorange observables

被引:10
作者
Roberts, Gethin Wyn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Faroe Isl, Fac Sci & Technol, FR-100 Torshavn, Denmark
关键词
GNSS; Carrier phase; Pseudorange; Doppler; Observable noise; MULTI-GNSS; GPS; PERFORMANCE; BIASES;
D O I
10.1016/j.measurement.2019.05.011
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The relative noise of data from all GNSS is investigated, considering the various satellite constellations, the different frequencies and also the historical satellite systems such as the various GPS blocks. The noise of the Range Residual and Ionospheric Residual geometry free approaches are scrutinized, illustrating the expected measurement precisions from the different types of satellites, and their comparisons. The noise characteristics are also studied by varying the elevation mask angle, as these techniques measure the noise in the observables, which can increase by lowering the elevation mask angle. The results illustrate that the newer generations of satellites do have less noisy data, and that GLONASS and SBAS in particular have the noisiest observables, and Galileo and BeiDou have the least noisy. The techniques presented in this paper could provide a real time data quality check in order to choose which satellites to use for the positioning solution. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 344
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] A systematic investigation of optimal carrier-phase combinations for modernized triple-frequency GPS
    Cocard, Marc
    Bourgon, Stephanie
    Kamali, Omid
    Collins, Paul
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2008, 82 (09) : 555 - 564
  • [32] Comparison and evaluation of carrier phase PPP and single difference time transfer with multi-GNSS ambiguity resolution
    Wei Xu
    Wenbin Shen
    Chenghui Cai
    Lihong Li
    Lei Wang
    An Ning
    Ziyu Shen
    GPS Solutions, 2022, 26
  • [33] Testing of a new single-frequency GNSS carrier phase attitude determination method: land, ship and aircraft experiments
    P. J. G. Teunissen
    G. Giorgi
    P. J. Buist
    GPS Solutions, 2011, 15 : 15 - 28
  • [34] Optimal linear combinations of triple frequency carrier phase data from future global navigation satellite systems
    Todd Richert
    Naser El-Sheimy
    GPS Solutions, 2007, 11 : 11 - 19
  • [35] Optimal linear combinations of triple frequency carrier phase data from future global navigation satellite systems
    Richert, Todd
    El-Sheimy, Naser
    GPS SOLUTIONS, 2007, 11 (01) : 11 - 19
  • [36] Ionospheric slant total electron content determination from multi-frequency GNSS signals carrier-phase measurements
    Pudlovskiy, Vladimir B.
    27TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEAN OPTICS, ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2021, 11916
  • [37] Recursive Carrier Interferometry Aided High Data Rate OFDM Systems With PAPR Suppression, Phase Noise Rejection, and Carrier Frequency Offsets Compensation
    Lu, Huaiyin
    Zhang, Lin
    Chen, Xianyu
    Wu, Zhiqiang
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 68 (04) : 3655 - 3671
  • [38] Inversion Method of Tidal Level Based on GNSS Triple-Frequency, Geometry-Free, Non-Ionospheric Phase Combination
    You, Gaochong
    Guo, Hang
    Wu, Jianfeng
    Yu, Min
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [39] Exploiting Carrier Frequency Offset and Phase Noise for Physical Layer Authentication in UAV-Aided Communication Systems
    Teng, Yulin
    Zhang, Pinchang
    Liu, Yangyang
    Dong, Jiankuo
    Xiao, Fu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 72 (08) : 4708 - 4724
  • [40] BDS-3/GNSS Undifferenced Pseudorange and Phase Time-Variant Mixed OSB Considering the Receiver Time-Variant Biases and Its Benefit on Multi-Frequency PPP
    Jiao, Guoqiang
    Su, Ke
    Fan, Min
    Yang, Yuze
    Hu, Huaquan
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (23)