Effect of wild-type and mutant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the rooting of mung bean cuttings

被引:102
|
作者
Mayak, S
Tirosh, T
Glick, BR
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Fac Agr Food & Environm Qual Sci, Kennedy Leigh Ctr Hort Res, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Biol, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
ethylene; plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria-adventitious roots; ACC deaminase; indole-3-acetic acid; mung bean;
D O I
10.1007/PL00007047
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Mung bean cuttings were dipped in solutions of wild type and mutant forms of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2 and then incubated for several days until roots formed. The bacteria P. putida GR12-2 and P. putida GR12-2/aux1 mutant do not produce detectable levels of the enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, whereas P. putida GR12-2/acd36 is an ACC deaminase minus mutant. All bacteria produce the phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and P. putida GR12-2/aux1 overproduces it. Treatment of cuttings with the above-mentioned bacteria affected the rates of ethylene production in the cuttings in a way that can be explained by the combined effects of the activity of ACC deaminase localized in the bacteria and bacterial produced IAA. P. putida GR12-2 and P. putida GR12-2/acd36-treated cuttings had a significantly higher number of roots compared with cuttings rooted in water. In addition, the wild type influenced the development of longer roots. P. putida GR12-2/aux1 stimulated the highest rates of ethylene production but did not influence the number of roots. These results are consistent with the notion that ethylene is involved ire the initiation and elongation of adventitious roots in mung bean cuttings.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 53
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria used in South Korea
    Ibal, Jerald Conrad
    Jung, Byung Kwon
    Park, Chang Eon
    Shin, Jae-Ho
    APPLIED BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 61 (06) : 709 - 716
  • [32] Endophytic colonization of spruce by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    Shishido, M
    Breuil, C
    Chanway, CP
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 1999, 29 (02) : 191 - 196
  • [33] Applications of free living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    M. Lucy
    E. Reed
    Bernard R. Glick
    Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2004, 86 : 1 - 25
  • [34] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria used in South Korea
    Jerald Conrad Ibal
    Byung Kwon Jung
    Chang Eon Park
    Jae-Ho Shin
    Applied Biological Chemistry, 2018, 61 : 709 - 716
  • [35] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning
    Vacheron, Jordan
    Desbrosses, Guilhem
    Bouffaud, Marie-Lara
    Touraine, Bruno
    Moenne-Loccoz, Yvan
    Muller, Daniel
    Legendre, Laurent
    Wisniewski-Dye, Florence
    Prigent-Combaret, Claire
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2013, 4
  • [36] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture
    P. N. Bhattacharyya
    D. K. Jha
    World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2012, 28 : 1327 - 1350
  • [37] Biocontrol of tomato wilt by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    Guo, JH
    Qi, HY
    Guo, YH
    Ge, HL
    Gong, LY
    Zhang, LX
    Sun, PH
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2004, 29 (01) : 66 - 72
  • [38] New advances in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for bioremediation
    Zhuang, Xuliang
    Chen, Jian
    Shim, Hojae
    Bai, Zhihui
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 33 (03) : 406 - 413
  • [39] BIOTECHNOLOGICAL POTENTIAL OF SOYBEAN PLANT GROWTH-PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA
    de Paula, Gabriel Ferreira
    Demetrio, Gilberto Bueno
    Matsumoto, Leopoldo Sussumu
    REVISTA CAATINGA, 2021, 34 (02) : 328 - 338
  • [40] Evaluation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on stockpiled bermudagrass
    Griffin, Megan E.
    Muntifering, Russell B.
    Mullenix, Mary K.
    Held, David W.
    Dillard, Sandra L.
    CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 6 (01)