Evaluating the coordinated development of economic, social and environmental benefits of urban public transportation infrastructure: Case study of four Chinese autonomous municipalities

被引:122
作者
Sun, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Cui, Yin [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ Commerce, Sch Publ Adm, Tianjin, Peoples R China
关键词
Urban public transportation infrastructure; Benefit; Coordinated development; Coupling coordination degree model; Panel regression model; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; COUPLING COORDINATION; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; CO2; EMISSIONS; GROWTH; IMPACTS; URBANIZATION; COUNTRIES; SECTOR; RAIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.02.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Urban public transportation infrastructure is a basic and necessary condition which ensures urban daily operation. The economic, social and environmental benefits of urban public transportation infrastructure are the positive impacts on urban economy, society and environment generated by the use of it respectively. Promoting their coordinated development is helpful to raise the level of urban public transportation infrastructure benefit. This paper evaluates the coordinated development of these three benefits taking four Chinese autonomous municipalities as examples. These four cities have large-scale urban public transportation infrastructure but its basic function has not been fully played. Whether these three benefits of urban public transportation infrastructure have been developed in harmony or not was unclear. We analyzed the coordinated development among three benefits by constructing coupling coordination degree model and studied the impacts of three benefits on their coordinated development level using panel regression model. The result showed that the coordinated development levels of three benefits of urban public transportation infrastructure were lower in these four cities and the impact of economic benefit on their coordinated development level was largest and social benefit insignificant. It was highly related with the development strategies and construction levels of urban public transportation infrastructure in these four cities. Three policy implications were put forward to the improvement of coordinated development level of three benefits of urban public transportation infrastructure.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 126
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   An empirical analysis of three econometric frameworks for evaluating economic impacts of transportation infrastructure expenditures across countries [J].
Agbelie, Bismark R. D. K. .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2014, 35 :304-310
[2]   Tourism and urban public transport: Holding demand pressure under supply constraints [J].
Albalate, Daniel ;
Bel, Germa .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2010, 31 (03) :425-433
[3]   Urban growth and transport infrastructure interaction in Jeddah between 1980 and 2007 [J].
Aljoufie, Mohammed ;
Brussel, Mark ;
Zuidgeest, Mark ;
van Maarseveen, Martin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2013, 21 :493-505
[4]   Transportation intensity, urbanization, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in the G-20 countries [J].
Arvin, Mak B. ;
Pradhan, Rudra P. ;
Norman, Neville R. .
UTILITIES POLICY, 2015, 35 :50-66
[5]   Are wider economic impacts of transport infrastructures always beneficial? Impacts of the Istanbul Metro on the generation of spatio-economic inequalities [J].
Beyazit, Eda .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 45 :12-23
[6]   Granger-causality between transportation and GDP: A panel data approach [J].
Beyzatlar, Mehrnet Aldonat ;
Karacal, Muge ;
Yetkiner, Hakan .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2014, 63 :43-55
[7]   Infrastructure, specialization, and economic growth [J].
Bougheas, S ;
Demetriades, PO ;
Mamuneas, TP .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2000, 33 (02) :506-522
[8]   Identifying the impacts of rail transit stations on residential property values [J].
Bowes, DR ;
Ihlanfeldt, KR .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2001, 50 (01) :1-25
[9]   Transit's value-added effects - Light and commuter rail services and commercial land values [J].
Cervero, R ;
Duncan, M .
TRAVEL DEMAND AND LAND USE 2002: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION, 2002, (1805) :8-15
[10]  
Chatman D. G., 2011, TRANSPORT REV, V32, P37