Experimental derivation of functions relating growth of Arabidopsis thaliana to neighbour size and distance

被引:49
作者
Purves, DW [1 ]
Law, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Biol, York YO10 5YD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
asymmetry; competition indices; Gompertz equation; monocultures; zone of influence;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00718.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
1 A dynamic competition kernel for a plant growing in the presence of a neighbour is a function describing how the competitive effect experienced by the plant depends on its own size, and the size of and distance to a neighbour. Competition experiments on Arabidopsis thaliana were used to derive dynamic competition kernels for this species. 2 The experiments entailed growing target plants in isolation, and with single neighbours of different relative sizes, and at different distances. Growth was determined from repeated measures of the area occupied by each plant. Target plants with smaller neighbours, or with neighbours that were further away, grew to a larger size than targets with larger, or closer, neighbours. 3 Relative growth rate (RGR ) of isolated plants was best described by the Gompertz equation, a standard plant growth equation that reduces RGR in proportion to the logarithm of plant size. 4 Competition kernels were constructed by modifying the Gompertz equation to include the competitive effect of a neighbour. Alternative kernels (including the zone of influence model), with and without a parameter of asymmetry of competition, were constructed from observed growth rates of target plants with neighbours over short time intervals. The kernels were evaluated based on their ability to predict the size of targets and neighbours over a much longer time period. 5 The kernel that best described growth overall was a simple function proportional to the logarithm of neighbour size, and decreasing with distance to the neighbour. The zone of influence model was best able to describe the effects of distance on competition, but was relatively unsuccessful when the two plants differed substantially in size. Including a parameter for asymmetry did not provide any notable improvements in predictive ability, and in many cases made the predictions worse.
引用
收藏
页码:882 / 894
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
AIKMAN DP, 1992, INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODELS AND APPROACHES IN ECOLOGY, P472
[2]   A MODEL FOR GROWTH AND SELF-THINNING IN EVEN-AGED MONOCULTURES OF PLANTS [J].
AIKMAN, DP ;
WATKINSON, AR .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1980, 45 (04) :419-427
[3]  
[Anonymous], ONCOIMMUNOLOGY
[4]   EXPERIMENTAL DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN CONTRASTING MODELS OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMPETITION [J].
BENJAMIN, LR .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1993, 81 (03) :417-423
[5]  
BENJAMIN LR, 1992, INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODELS AND APPROACHES IN ECOLOGY, P455
[6]   A comparison of different rules of partitioning of crop growth between individual plants [J].
Benjamin, LR .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1999, 115 (2-3) :111-118
[7]   DETAILS OF LOCAL DISPERSION IMPROVE THE FIT OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMPETITION MODELS [J].
BERGELSON, J .
OECOLOGIA, 1993, 95 (02) :299-302
[8]  
BIGING GS, 1992, FOREST SCI, V38, P695
[9]   THE SIZE STRUCTURE OF THEORETICAL PLANT-POPULATIONS - SPATIAL PATTERNS AND NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS [J].
BONAN, GB .
ECOLOGY, 1988, 69 (06) :1721-1730
[10]   ANALYSIS OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMPETITION AMONG ANNUAL PLANTS - IMPLICATIONS OF A PLANT-GROWTH MODEL [J].
BONAN, GB .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1993, 65 (1-2) :123-136