Clouded judgments? Aesthetics, morality and everyday life in early 21st century culture

被引:15
作者
Kuipers, Giselinde [1 ]
Franssen, Thomas [2 ]
Holla, Sylvia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Cultural Sociol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Ctr Sci & Technol Studies CWTS, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Atria Inst Gender Equal & Womens Hist, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Aesthetics; consumer culture; cultural sociology; cultural studies; material turn; morality; orders of worth; post-Fordism; valuation studies; BEAUTY IDEALS; SOCIOLOGY; GOODNESS; HEALTH; RACE;
D O I
10.1177/1367549419861634
中图分类号
G [文化、科学、教育、体育]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 04 ;
摘要
This special issue investigates the relationship between aesthetics and morality. How do the good and the beautiful, the bad and the ugly, happen in everyday life? How do these 'orders of worth' interact? Do they reinforce each other? What happens when they contradict one another? Does one order typically trump the other? Five contributions, from Israel, Italy and the Netherlands, scrutinize different sites where both aesthetics - the continuum of evaluations from beautiful to ugly - and morality - evaluations about good and evil, right and wrong - have a strong presence. The contributions zoom in on everyday cultural consumption, where people create, seek out and discuss 'good' food, clothing, films and architecture, and professional situations where people look for 'good' jobs, want to work in 'good' work spaces and aim to be a 'good' worker. Integrating insights from cultural studies, sociology, valuation studies and science and technology studies, this special issue shows, first, how judgments of aesthetic and moral value are central to the fabric of social life - from the smallest level of everyday interactions to the large scale of economic relations and power im/balances. Second, these valuations often clash, blend and blur. This blurring and blending enables the drawing of social boundaries, the consolidation of identities and the shaping of selves. But it also allows for seduction, manipulation and obfuscation of power dynamics. Third, the contributions show that in contemporary post-Fordist, meritocratic consumer societies, beauty and morality are increasingly entangled with economic and political logics, leading to new social struggles and new forms of alienation and exploitation.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 398
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   21ST CENTURY THEATER - REGRESS OR PROGRESS? [J].
Obracaj, Piotr .
ARCHITECTURE CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 11 (04) :55-66
[32]   A reflection on faculty diversity in the 21st century [J].
Trejo, JoAnn .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2017, 28 (22) :2911-2914
[33]   ETHNIC DIFFERENTIATION OF MORTALITY, LIFE EXPECTANCY AND HEALTH IN LATVIA AT THE BEGINNING OF 21ST CENTURY [J].
Krumins, Juris ;
Ponomarjova, Denize .
NEW CHALLENGES OF ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT - 2016, 2016, :429-441
[34]   Double Consciousness in the 21st Century: Du Boisian Theory and the Problem of Racialized Legal Status [J].
Joseph, Tiffany ;
Golash-Boza, Tanya .
SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 10 (09)
[35]   Early 21st century penal reform: A comparative analysis of four states' responses to the problems of mass incarceration [J].
Schoenfeld, Heather ;
Campbell, Michael C. .
LAW & POLICY, 2023, 45 (04) :482-506
[36]   From Value to Values, from Field to Discipline: Understanding Journalistic Culture in the 21st Century [J].
Anderson, C. W. .
SOCIOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR SOCIOLOGICAL DEBATE, 2020, 14 (02) :93-100
[37]   Toward a Sociology of Racial Conceptualization for the 21st Century [J].
Morning, Ann .
SOCIAL FORCES, 2009, 87 (03) :1167-1192
[38]   The Dark Matter: Race and Racism in the 21st Century [J].
Winant, Howard .
CRITICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2015, 41 (02) :313-324
[39]   Cancer Prevention in the 21st Century: The Preventorium Concept [J].
Huerta, Elmer E. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2012, 23 (04) :1698-1703
[40]   Herbert Marcuse: "The End of the Utopia" in the 21st Century [J].
Lopez Saenz, Ma Carmen .
DAIMON-REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE FILOSOFIA, 2018, (74) :71-88