RETRACTED: The effect of firm size, industry type and ownership structure on the relationship between firms' sustainable innovation capability and stock liquidity (Retracted Article)

被引:10
作者
Tang, Liang [1 ]
Gu, Zhen [2 ]
Zhang, Qi [1 ]
Liu, Jiali [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Normal Univ, Business Sch, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accountancy, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Univ, Ctr China Publ Sect Econ Res KRI, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[4] Jilin Univ, Sch Econ, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
Sustainable innovation capability; Ownership structure; Firm size; Firm innovation; Industry type; Stock liquidity; Difference in difference (DID); MARKET; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1007/s12063-021-00241-9
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Does the company attach importance to research and development (R&D) investment in its operations? Is stock liquidity detrimental to corporate innovation and thus damages the company's sustainable development capabilities? We estimate the relationship between between stock liquidity and firms' sustainable innovation capability on China's stock market by OLS method and difference in difference (DID) method. The traditional conclusion is: the higher the stock liquidity, the weaker the enterprise's sustainable innovation level, especially in state-owned enterprises. The DID estimation using the share-trading reform and the policy of large and small-sized non-tradable share shows that: stock liquidity will affect the sustainable innovation level of the enterprise positively. The reasons for this mechanism are the supervision mechanism in the operation of the enterprise, the effect of the balance of the ownership structure and the improvement of corporate governance. The conclusions are that the improvement of ownership concentration promotes this positive relationship, and the behavior of institutional investors does not have a significant impact. These findings also provide new insights into the relationship between corporate management and shareholder investment behavior on the level of innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 837
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Innovation and Institutional Ownership [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Van Reenen, John ;
Zingales, Luigi .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :277-304
[2]   ASSET PRICING AND THE BID ASK SPREAD [J].
AMIHUD, Y ;
MENDELSON, H .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1986, 17 (02) :223-249
[3]   Liquidity, the Value of the Firm, and Corporate Finance [J].
Amihud, Yakov ;
Mendelson, Haim .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CORPORATE FINANCE, 2008, 20 (02) :32-+
[4]  
Antunes MG, 2017, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V34, P1474, DOI 10.1108/IJQRM-02-2016-0025
[5]   Do Hostile Takeovers Stifle Innovation? Evidence from Antitakeover Legislation and Corporate Patenting [J].
Atanassov, Julian .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2013, 68 (03) :1097-1131
[6]   THE HIDDEN COSTS OF STOCK-MARKET LIQUIDITY [J].
BHIDE, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1993, 34 (01) :31-51
[7]   Do financing constraints matter for R&D? [J].
Brown, James R. ;
Martinsson, Gustav ;
Petersen, Bruce C. .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 56 (08) :1512-1529
[8]   Do Institutional Investors Prefer Near-Term Earnings over Long-Run Value? [J].
Bushee, Brian J. .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2001, 18 (02) :207-246
[9]   Do Antitakeover Provisions Spur Corporate Innovation? A Regression Discontinuity Analysis [J].
Chemmanur, Thomas J. ;
Tian, Xuan .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2018, 53 (03) :1163-1194
[10]   Corporate social responsibility and capacity sharing in a duopoly model [J].
Chen, Junlong ;
Wang, Xiaomeng ;
Liu, Jiali .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2021, 28 (06) :512-517