Educating Critical Qualitative Health Researchers in the Land of the Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:54
作者
Eakin, Joan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Ctr Crit Qualitat Hlth Res, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
关键词
cross-disciplinary methodology; methodologies; qualitative health research; qualitative research; qualitative research and education; critical pedagogy; teaching qualitative research; training; evaluating; extending qualitative methods; pedagogy; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GUIDELINES; PARADIGMS; KNOWLEDGE; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1177/1077800415617207
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Drawing on long experience as a sociologist in the health academy, I explore the challenges of practicing and teaching critical qualitative research in an environment dominated by very different scientific reasoning. I account for the transgressive positioning of qualitative research in the health sciences in terms of the role of social theory in interpretive research, rising interest in qualitative approaches among health professionals, research and educational doctrines that impede value-added analysis, and the ascendance of applied, post-positivist forms of qualitative research. Strategies for producing critical qualitative researchers who can both survive and thrive in the health arena include creation of institutional authority, prioritization of methodological depth over breadth, teaching pragmatic but non-compromising survival skills, and forging supportive communities of practice. I describe how one particular academic organization is engaging with these strategies and reflect on future prospects for educating critical qualitative researchers in the field of health.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 118
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Albert M, 2014, ROUT INT HANDB, P369
[2]   Boundary-Work in the Health Research Field: Biomedical and Clinician Scientists' Perceptions of Social Science Research [J].
Albert, Mathieu ;
Laberge, Suzanne ;
Hodges, Brian D. .
MINERVA, 2009, 47 (02) :171-194
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, BEST PRACTICES MIXED
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, FORUM QUALITATIVE SO
[5]   WHOSE SIDE ARE WE ON [J].
BECKER, HS .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 1967, 14 (03) :239-247
[6]   Cochrane reviews and the behavioural turn in evidence-based medicine [J].
Bell, Kirsten .
HEALTH SOCIOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 21 (03) :313-321
[7]  
Chamberlain K, 2000, J Health Psychol, V5, P285, DOI 10.1177/135910530000500306
[8]   Qualitative inquiry, ethics, and politics of evidence - Working within these spaces rather than being worked over by them [J].
Cheek, Julianne .
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2007, 13 (08) :1051-1059
[9]   Scientific-Based Research and Randomized Controlled Trials, the "Gold" Standard? Alternative Paradigms and Mixed Methodologies [J].
Christ, Thomas W. .
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2014, 20 (01) :72-80
[10]  
Coffey S., 2003, KEY THEMES QUALITATI, P71