Magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissue tumors

被引:119
作者
De Schepper, AM
De Beuckeleer, L
Vandevenne, J
Somville, J
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Radiol, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium
关键词
soft tissue turners; characterization; staging; grading; recurrence;
D O I
10.1007/s003300050037
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This article outlines the ability of MR imaging in staging, grading, tissue characterization, and posttherapeutic surveillance of soft tissue tumors. Well-known staging parameters, such as extent, relationship with adjacent structures, and detection of intralesional necrosis, are used in the MR protocol for locoregional staging. Bone scintigraphy and high-resolution CT scan of the lungs are best methods for ruling out metastatic spread. A variety of (solitary or combinations of) grading parameters are described in the radiological literature. The role of MR imaging is to afford recognition of these lesions that need fur-ther aggressive work-up, excluding all others. Despite controversial reports, the definite role of MR imaging in grading of soft tissue tumors seems to become established. As for grading, a lot of individual characteristics used for tissue characterization have low sensitivity, but combinations of parameters (age, site, signal intensities) are more useful and often allow to predict a specific diagnosis or to narrow down the list of differential diagnoses. Local recurrences of soft tissue tumors are frequent and can be detected accurately by an easy-to-use MR algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 222
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Superficial soft-tissue masses suggestive of recurrent malignancy: Sonographic localization and biopsy [J].
Alexander, AA ;
Nazarian, LN ;
Feld, RI .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (05) :1449-1451
[2]   VALUE OF MR IMAGING IN DIFFERENTIATING BENIGN FROM MALIGNANT SOFT-TISSUE MASSES - STUDY OF 95 LESIONS [J].
BERQUIST, TH ;
EHMAN, RL ;
KING, BF ;
HODGMAN, CG ;
ILSTRUP, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (06) :1251-1255
[3]  
BONGARTZ G, 1992, RADIOLOGE, V32, P584
[4]   Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with histologic tumor grade: Comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media [J].
Daldrup, H ;
Shames, DM ;
Wendland, M ;
Okuhata, Y ;
Link, TM ;
Rosenau, W ;
Lu, Y ;
Brasch, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (04) :941-949
[5]  
De Schepper A M, 1992, J Belge Radiol, V75, P286
[6]  
DESCHEPPER A, 1999, SEMIN MUSCULOSKELETA, V3, P59
[7]  
DESCHEPPER A, 1997, IMAGING SOFT TISSUE, P127
[8]   STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF MRI PARAMETERS PREDICTING MALIGNANCY IN 141 SOFT-TISSUE MASSES [J].
DESCHEPPER, AM ;
RAMON, FA ;
DEGRYSE, HR .
FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1992, 156 (06) :587-591
[9]  
DESCHEPPER AM, 1997, IMAGING SOFT TISSUE
[10]   DYNAMIC MR TOMOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF INFLAMMATORY AND TUMOROUS SPACE-OCCUPYING GROWTHS OF THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM [J].
ERLEMANN, R ;
SCIUK, J ;
WUISMAN, P ;
BENE, D ;
EDEL, G ;
RITTER, J ;
PETERS, PE .
FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1992, 156 (04) :353-359