Formulation and application of weight-function-based physical programming

被引:3
作者
Yuan, Yifeng [1 ]
Ling, Zhihao [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Chong [1 ]
Cao, Jianfu [1 ]
机构
[1] E China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Key Lab Adv Control & Optimizat Chem Proc ECUST, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
physical programming; preference; weight function; multi-objective optimization; Pareto solutions; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; REDUNDANCY ALLOCATION; DESIGN; PREFERENCES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1080/0305215X.2013.858140
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Physical programming is effective in multi-objective optimization since it assists the designer to find the most preferred solution. Preference-function-based physical programming (PFPP) abandons the weighted-sum approach and its performance in generating Pareto solutions is susceptible to the transformation of pseudo-preferences. With the aim of integrating a weighted-sum approach into physical programming and generating well-distributed Pareto solutions, a weight-function-based physical programming (WFPP) method has been proposed. The approach forms a weight function for each normalized criterion and uses the variable weighted sum of all criteria as the aggregate objective function. Implementation for numerical and engineering design problems indicates that WFPP works as well as PFPP. The design process of generating Pareto solutions by WFPP is further presented, where the pseudo-preferences are allowed to transform in different ranges. Examples and results demonstrate that solutions generated by WFPP have better diversity performance than those of PFPP, especially when the pseudo-preferences are far from the true Pareto front.
引用
收藏
页码:1628 / 1650
页数:23
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, THESIS RICE U HOUSTO
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, INT J COMPUT INTELL, DOI DOI 10.5019/J.IJCIR.2006.67
  • [3] A comprehensive preference-based optimization framework with application to high-lift aerodynamic design
    Carrese, Robert
    Winarto, Hadi
    Li, Xiaodong
    Sobester, Andras
    Ebenezer, Samuel
    [J]. ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2012, 44 (10) : 1209 - 1227
  • [4] Including different kinds of preferences in a multi-objective ant algorithm for time and space assembly line balancing on different Nissan scenarios
    Chica, Manuel
    Cordon, Oscar
    Damas, Sergio
    Bautista, Joaquin
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (01) : 709 - 720
  • [5] A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems
    Das, I
    Dennis, JE
    [J]. STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1997, 14 (01) : 63 - 69
  • [6] Deb K., 2000, P PAR PROBL SOLV NAT, VVI, P849, DOI DOI 10.1007/3-540-45356-3_
  • [7] Structural Parameters Optimization of Parallel Stable Platform Based on Physical Programming
    Dong, Zhonghui
    Ding, Hongsheng
    Jiang, Fang
    Huang, Zhichen
    Fu, Tie
    [J]. ADVANCES IN DESIGN TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2012, 215-216 : 187 - 192
  • [8] Developing sorting models using preference disaggregation analysis: An experimental investigation
    Doumpos, M
    Zopounidis, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 154 (03) : 585 - 598
  • [9] Evolutionary algorithms with preference polyhedron for interval multi-objective optimization problems
    Gong, Dunwei
    Sun, Jing
    Ji, Xinfang
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 233 : 141 - 161
  • [10] Optimatity framework for Hausdorff tracking using mutational dynamics and physical programming
    Goradia, Amit
    Haffner, Clayton
    Xi, Ning
    Mutka, Matt
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-10, 2007, : 3476 - +